Evidence mapPaperPMID 41127709Full record

ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Western Pacific2025

Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis household contact screening and management by community healthcare workers in Mongolia: a prospective implementation study.

Bazarragchaa Tsogt, Tsegmed Sambuu, Yanjindulam Purevsuren, Sergelen Munkhbaatar, Purevsuren Batsuren, Oyun-Erdene Khandaa, Narantsetseg Doyod, Nasanjargal Byambaa, Norovrenchin Tsogtgerel, Gregory J Fox and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Bazarragchaa TsogtMongolian Anti-Tuberculosis Coalition, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia.
Tsegmed SambuuNational Center for Public Health of the Ministry of Health of Mongolia, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia.
Yanjindulam PurevsurenNational Center for Communicable Diseases of the Ministry of Health, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia.
Sergelen MunkhbaatarMongolian Anti-Tuberculosis Association, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia.
Purevsuren BatsurenBayanzurkh District Tuberculosis Dispensary, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia.
Oyun-Erdene KhandaaSongino-Khairkhan District Tuberculosis Dispensary, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia.
Narantsetseg DoyodSelenge Province Tuberculosis Dispensary, Sukhbaatar, Mongolia.
Nasanjargal ByambaaBayangol District Tuberculosis Dispensary, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia.
Norovrenchin TsogtgerelKhan-Uul District Tuberculosis Dispensary, Sukhbaatar, Mongolia.
Gregory J FoxFaculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Stephen M GrahamUniversity of Melbourne Department of Paediatrics and Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Mongolia is a high burden country for multidrug- or rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (MDR/RR-TB). The implementation of systematic household TB contact investigation has been very limited despite policy recommendations. We implemented a community-based approach to MDR/RR-TB contact screening and management. Methods: We conducted a prospective implementation study in the nine districts of Ulaanbaatar and 10 other provinces. Community health workers (CHWs) were trained to identify and screen household contacts of patients with confirmed pulmonary MDR/RR-TB. Initial screening included symptom assessment for all with chest radiography for adult contacts or tuberculin skin test (TST) for child or young adolescent contacts (<15 years). Follow-up visits to households were conducted quarterly for 12 months. Six months of daily levofloxacin (6Lfx) was offered to eligible contacts, i.e. <15 years, TST-positive and without disease. Findings: Of 99 people with pulmonary MDR/RR-TB, 349 household contacts were identified and 347 (99.4%) were screened by CHWs at initial home-based visit. Contact screening coverage remained high (>98%) for each quarterly visit up to 12 months of follow-up. TB was diagnosed in 17 contacts (4.9%); ten from initial screen, seven from follow-up screen and 12 (71%) were children or adolescents. Four contacts were diagnosed with bacteriologically confirmed MDR/RR-TB and two died. 6Lfx was initiated in 15 (43%) of 35 eligible contacts who all completed therapy without interruption. Interpretation: A decentralized model for the screening and management of MDR/RR-TB contacts implemented by trained CHWs has wider potential for increasing TB detection and prevention in Mongolia and the region. Funding: John Burge Trust and National Health and Medical Research Council, Australia.

Indexed as

Community healthcare workers, MongoliaDecentralisationDrug-resistant tuberculosisHousehold contactTB preventive treatment

Identifiers

PMID41127709
PMCPMC12537571

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.