Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41127917›Full record

Trial reportClinical and translational science2025

Development of a Novel Machine Learning Method for Estimation of Life-Long Chronic Disease Progression and Its Application to Type 2 Diabetes.

Yamato Sano, Ryota Jin, Hideki Yoshioka, Yuki Nakazato, Hiromi Sato, Akihiro Hisaka

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical and translational science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It reports registered trial NCT00000620. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00000620 phase3completed

Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD)

Ran1999Enrolled10,251Registered outcomes6Posted comparisons6ConditionsAtherosclerosis, Cardiovascular Diseases, Coronary Disease, Diabetes MellitusArmsAnti-hyperglycemic Agents, Anti-hypertensive Agents, Blinded fenofibrate or placebo plus simvastatin
Open the trial in the graph
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yamato SanoClinical Pharmacology and Pharmacometrics, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-5512-2190
Ryota JinClinical Pharmacology and Pharmacometrics, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.ORCID 0009-0001-6783-4398
Hideki YoshiokaClinical Pharmacology and Pharmacometrics, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.ORCID 0009-0008-0708-2543
Yuki NakazatoClinical Pharmacology and Pharmacometrics, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.ORCID 0009-0009-4612-3149
Hiromi SatoClinical Pharmacology and Pharmacometrics, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-8815-4829
Akihiro HisakaClinical Pharmacology and Pharmacometrics, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-4863-9308

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Individual predictions of long-term chronic disease progression from data of limited duration provide valuable insights into estimating patient outcomes and therapeutic needs. Statistical Restoration of Fragmented Time course (SReFT) was developed to address this challenge, yet it is computationally too intensive for large-scale datasets. Although diabetes is a representative chronic disease with significant medical needs, it has been challenging to analyze long-term changes using large-scale patient data due to this limitation. In this study, we aimed to develop a new method (SReFT-machine learning, SReFT-ML) by applying machine learning to the concept of SReFT, and to confirm its performance using synthetic data and the data from a clinical trial, the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) trial (N = 10,251). SReFT-ML has successfully analyzed both synthetic and clinical data, and reconstructed biomarker trajectories over a 30-year period in patients with diabetes. Decreases in diastolic blood pressure and renal function may be important indicators of disease progression. Furthermore, although age and mortality data were not included in the model, survival analysis demonstrated a clear trend of hazard increases in mortality and diabetes-related outcomes with disease progression. This study introduced machine learning to enhance long-term disease progression modeling. The resulting model characterized a 30-year trajectory of disease risk in diabetes. The results provide a clinically meaningful hypothesis that incorporating systemic factors such as renal function and blood pressure, in addition to classic glycemic control, may enhance comprehensive diabetes care. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT00000620.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Machine LearningAgedBiomarkersChronic DiseaseDisease ProgressionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTime FactorsBiomarkersbiomarkersdiabetes mellitusdisease progressionmachine learningmodeling

Identifiers

PMID41127917
PMCPMC12547360

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.