Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41129013›Full record

ReviewProbiotics and antimicrobial proteins2026

Benefits that Death Does Not Part: the Promise of Postbiotics for Bone Health.

Jaqueline Lemes Ribeiro, Thaís Aguiar Santos, Ana Lia Anbinder

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jaqueline Lemes RibeiroDepartment of Bioscience and Oral Diagnosis, Institute of Science and Technology of São José Dos Campos, São Paulo State University (Unesp), Av. Engenheiro Francisco José Longo 777, São José Dos Campos, São Paulo, CEP 12.245-000, Brazil.
Thaís Aguiar SantosDepartment of Bioscience and Oral Diagnosis, Institute of Science and Technology of São José Dos Campos, São Paulo State University (Unesp), Av. Engenheiro Francisco José Longo 777, São José Dos Campos, São Paulo, CEP 12.245-000, Brazil.
Ana Lia AnbinderDepartment of Bioscience and Oral Diagnosis, Institute of Science and Technology of São José Dos Campos, São Paulo State University (Unesp), Av. Engenheiro Francisco José Longo 777, São José Dos Campos, São Paulo, CEP 12.245-000, Brazil. ana.anbinder@unesp.br.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Postmenopausal osteoporosis (PMO) is a widespread global health concern characterized by hormone deficiency. The existing therapies for PMO often have undesirable side effects, necessitating the development of safe and effective alternative treatments. Probiotics, which are live microorganisms that promote the host health, have been explored as a potential solution. However, concerns have been raised regarding their use, particularly the safety when administered to vulnerable populations (e.g., elderly and immunodeficient individuals). Additionally, the industrial processing and storage of probiotic products present technological challenges that can compromise their viability. To address these drawbacks, the focus has shifted towards non-viable probiotics known as postbiotics. Postbiotics are defined as inactivated (dead) microbial cells or their byproducts that provide health benefits to consumers. They exhibit immunomodulatory properties and demonstrate antagonistic effects against pathogens. Furthermore, postbiotics offer enhanced safety, technological advantages, and practical benefits. By leveraging these unique attributes, postbiotics present a promising opportunity to introduce novel therapies that are safer and more stable. This review provides an overview of key considerations surrounding postbiotics, summarizes recent literature on their application in PMO, and underscores the urgent need for further randomized clinical trials. These trials should evaluate the safety, efficacy, and mechanisms of action of postbiotic products to support regulatory decision-making processes.

Indexed as

Bone and BonesOsteoporosis, PostmenopausalProbioticsAnimalsFemaleHumansBone healthGut microbiotaMicrobiomeOsteoporosisPostbioticsProbiotics

Identifiers

PMID41129013

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.