Trial reportApplied psychophysiology and biofeedback2026
Gastric Biofeedback in Virtual Reality: Feasibility, Efficacy and Self-Reported Experience.
Trial report in Applied psychophysiology and biofeedback, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Normal gastric functioning (normogastria) is characterized by rhythmic gastric myoelectric activity, while dysrhythmic gastric activity (bradygastria and tachygastria) is associated with symptoms such as nausea, epigastric discomfort and fullness. Gastric biofeedback using electrogastrography (EGG) has emerged as a promising tool to regulate gastric rhythm, but research remains limited with few experimental studies. The current study (N = 94) tested a novel gastric biofeedback training in virtual reality (VR). We used a randomized controlled study design with three groups: (1) VR gastric biofeedback training, (2) the same training on a 2D screen and (3) a relaxation control group. We examined (1) the trajectory of gastric activity before, during, and after training (2) participants' ability to increase normogastria and reduce dysrhythmic activity and (3) self-reported experiences (motivation, attention, mood, presence, user acceptance, etc.). Results showed the expected peak in normogastria and a nadir in dysrhythmic activity during training, with a significant reduction in dysrhythmic gastric activity across sessions. Participants reported an improved ability to handle physical discomfort over time. VR and 2D groups reported faster time perception and better concentration than controls. Spatial presence (i.e., the feeling of "being there") was higher in the VR group than in the 2D group. Enjoyment, concentration, and alertness were initially high but declined over time in all groups. The results demonstrate the general technical feasibility of the paradigm and positive evaluations. Further research is needed to better understand the underlying mechanisms and to determine whether and how training success may relate to beneficial outcomes in clinical populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.