ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2025
Prognostic significance of bilateral carotid plaque asymmetry for major cardiovascular events in high-risk patients: a 3-year retrospective cohort study.
Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Carotid atherosclerotic plaque burden and asymmetry may reflect systemic vascular instability, but their prognostic value for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in high-risk patients remains unclear. In this retrospective cohort study, 200 high-risk patients (age ≥ 65 years, ≥ 2 cardiovascular risk factors) who underwent bilateral carotid ultrasound between January 2015 and December 2019 were included and followed for 3 years to assess incident MACE. Baseline clinical and imaging variables (asymmetry index) were collected. A predictive model and corresponding nomogram were developed using multivariate logistic regression techniques. Internal validation was performed using bootstrap resampling, and external validation was conducted in a separate cohort of 70 patients screened in 2020. Among the 200 patients in the derivation cohort, 70 (35.0%) developed MACE during follow-up. Compared with the event-free group, the MACE group had a higher age (median 72 vs. 68 years, P < 0.001), a more frequent smoking history (52.9% vs. 32.3%, P = 0.008), lower eGFR (72.0 vs. 86.0 mL/min/1.73 m², P = 0.001), and higher plaque asymmetry index (0.38 vs. 0.21, P < 0.001). The final logistic regression model included four variables: age (for each increase in year, OR 1.06; 95% CI 1.01-1.12), smoking history (ever smoked vs. never smoked, OR 2.17; 95% CI 1.08-4.37), eGFR (for 10 mL/min decrement, OR 0.73; 95% CI 0.60-0.88), and AI (for 0.1 increase in AI; OR 2.28; 95% CI 1.32-3.96). The nomogram demonstrated an AUC of 0.88 (95% CI 0.82-0.94) in the derivation cohort and 0.81 in the external validation cohort, with good calibration and non-significant Hosmer - Lemeshow tests. While bilateral carotid plaque asymmetry and burden may add prognostic value for MACE, this will need to be validated in larger and multicenter studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41129085What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.