ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2026
Unsupervised phenotypic clustering of cardiac MRI data reveals distinct subgroups associated with outcomes in ischemic cardiomyopathy.
Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) shows significant heterogeneity in clinical outcomes, challenging traditional risk stratification methods. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging offers detailed insights into myocardial structure and function, yet integrating this multidimensional data remains complex. Aim of the current study was to assess whether unsupervised machine learning could help identify distinct phenotypic subgroups and enhance prognostic accuracy. This study included 319 clinically stable ICM patients. CMR-derived variables, including left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), ventricular volumes, and myocardial scar burden, were analysed using KAMILA clustering algorithm. The optimal number of clusters was determined through silhouette analysis, within-cluster sum of squares, and gap statistics. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) visualized the clustering results, and prognostic value was assessed using Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) values were used to evaluate feature importance. Two distinct phenotypic clusters were identified. Cluster 1 (n = 219) demonstrated better cardiac function, with higher LVEF, smaller ventricular volumes, and lower scar burden. Cluster 2 (n = 100) indicated advanced disease, with lower LVEF, larger volumes, higher scar burden, and greater midwall fibrosis. PCA confirmed clear separation between clusters, explaining 62.6% of the variance. After a median follow-up of 13 months, the composite endpoint was observed in 37 (12%) patients. Patients in Cluster 2 had a significantly higher risk of experiencing the composite outcome (HR = 3.96, p < 0.001). SHAP analysis identified ischaemic scar burden, sphericity index, and midwall fibrosis as key predictors of outcomes. Unsupervised clustering of CMR-derived variables identified distinct ICM phenotypes with important prognostic implications. This method improves risk stratification and could help tailor personalised treatment plans, highlighting the potential of machine learning in understanding ICM heterogeneity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.