ArticleInternational journal of cancer2026
Pre-diagnostic immunological markers of bacterial translocation and liver cancer risk: A nested case-control analysis of 12 prospective cohorts.
Article in International journal of cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Pre-diagnostic immunological markers of bacterial translocation and liver cancer risk: A nested case-control analysis of 12 prospective cohorts.International journal of cancer · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
37 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The gut-liver axis may play an important role in hepatocarcinogenesis. However, limited prospective research has explored associations with liver cancer risk. We conducted a nested case-control study based in 12 prospective cohort studies from across the United States, which included 867 cases of liver cancer and 867 matched controls. We measured bacterial translocation markers, specifically immunoglobulin (Ig) A, IgG, and IgM against lipopolysaccharide and flagellin; soluble CD14 (a co-receptor for lipopolysaccharide); and lipopolysaccharide-binding protein. Multivariable conditional logistic regression was used to estimate adjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) between bacterial translocation marker concentrations per doubling in concentrations and liver cancer risk. Lipopolysaccharide-binding protein concentrations were most strongly associated with higher liver cancer risk (OR per doubling in concentrations: 1.48, 95% CI: 1.23-1.79). Concentrations of anti-flagellin IgA (1.13, 1.01-1.28) and IgG (1.13, 1.01-1.28), anti-lipopolysaccharide IgG (1.20, 1.01-1.42), and soluble CD14 (1.12, 1.01-1.24) were also associated with liver cancer risk. When analyses were separated into hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC, N = 436 cases) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC, N = 110 cases), no evidence of heterogeneity was observed except for lipopolysaccharide-binding protein concentrations, which were positively associated with HCC (1.77, 1.34-2.33) but not ICC (0.67, 0.37-1.22; p-heterogeneity = .003). Associations did not differ by time to liver cancer diagnosis or other subgroups. These findings support the role of gut barrier dysfunction in hepatocarcinogenesis, necessitating further research to understand the complex interplay among the mechanisms and risk factors disrupting the gut barrier, microbiota, and liver cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.