ReviewJournal of neuromuscular diseases2026
Emerging therapies in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies.
Review in Journal of neuromuscular diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Self-efficacy in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies: associated factors, profiles and patient-reported outcomes.Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- New treatments in myositis on the horizon.EULAR rheumatology open · 2026Review
- Identification of genetic variants associated with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies via cross-trait analysis with B cell lymphomas.HGG advances · 2026Article
- Convergent innate immune and regulated cell-death pathways in selected myopathies.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM), also known as myositis, are a group of heterogeneous autoimmune diseases characterized by muscle inflammation and frequent involvement of extramuscular organs. Autoantibodies are present in approximately 70% of the patients. Despite treatment advances, management of IIM largely relies on empirical approaches and current treatment options lack robust evidence, with the exception of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg). Even with immunosuppressive therapy, up to 80% of the patients continue to experience ongoing disease activity, functional impairment and a significant reduced quality of life. Several challenges complicate the management of IIM, including rare occurrence, heterogeneity of the disease, systemic manifestations, higher prevalence of malignancies and the complexity of conducting large-scale clinical trials in rare diseases. Along with this, therapeutic development has long been hindered by an incomplete understanding of the disease pathogenesis. However, recent insights into the molecular and cellular mechanisms of IIM have revealed novel therapeutic targets. In this review, we will discuss the underlying immunopathogenesis of IIM, including the role of potentially pathogenic autoantibodies, B and T cells, the interferon (IFN) pathway and the complement system. We will also review current treatment strategies and provide an overview of emerging and promising new treatments tested in recently published clinical trials or ongoing clinical trials, including chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, T-cell engagers, T-cell targeting therapies, neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn) inhibitors, and small-molecule inhibitors targeting intracellular signaling molecules such as Janus kinases (JAKs), IFNs, and complement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.