ArticleUltrasonics sonochemistry2025
Numerical study on the evolution of cavitating flow and collapse-induced erosion characteristics in high-speed hydraulic tunnel.
Article in Ultrasonics sonochemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
While hydrodynamic cavitation and the associated erosion during cavity collapse have received significant attention, existing research has predominantly focused on small-scale geometries like Venturi tubes. In this study,afirst high-resolution numerical simulation is conducted to investigate cavitation and erosion phenomena within a large-scale, high-speed hydraulic tunnel.We employthe large eddy simulation approachto investigatethe characteristics of cavitation structures under varying cavitation numbers.The study elucidatesthe pressure loss process induced by cavitation blockage flow, anddiscussesthe vortex-induced cavitation mechanism along with the feedback effect of cavity collapse on vortical structures. Ata representative cavitation number of 0.89, the cavitation dynamics are dominated by a spatially partitioned coexistence mechanism of condensation shock and re-entrant jet-induced shedding. This partitioning phenomenon is primarily attributed to the tunnel's asymmetric geometry and the significant gravitational effects inherent to large-scale hydraulic tunnels. Novel methods based on physical theory are proposed for identifying cavity collapse regions within the flow field and predicting wall erosion risk regions;these methods have beenexperimentally validated. The wall erosion risk under the condensation shock shedding cycle is found to be significantly higher than that under the re-entrant jetcycle. Furthermore, wall erosion in hydraulic tunnels is more likely to occur near the boundaries, with high-risk areas concentrated primarilyin the downstream regions. Conversely, cavitation occurs withintheextensive middle regions of each wall. This disparity arises because cavitation initiates more readily on smooth surfaces, whereas collapse-induced erosion is favored in pressure recovery zones.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.