ArticleBMJ open2025
Cortical-multifidus paired associative stimulation for improving motor function in patients with chronic low back pain: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Integrated Multiomics Analysis Reveals Manual Therapy Restores Autophagic Homeostasis via the AMPK/ULK1 Axis in Chronic Low Back Pain.Pain research & management · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionChronic low back pain (CLBP) is characterised by multifaceted pathophysiology involving both central sensitisation and peripheral dysfunction. Conventional therapies often fail to address this complexity due to their unidimensional targets. Paired associative stimulation (PAS), a dual-target neuromodulatory approach that combines central and peripheral interventions, has demonstrated efficacy in enhancing motor recovery post-stroke by synchronously inducing corticospinal plasticity and peripheral neuromuscular adaptation. Building on this paradigm, we propose a novel combined primary motor cortex (M1) and multifidus muscle stimulation protocol. The intervention pairs transcranial magnetic stimulation over M1 with peripheral magnetic stimulation targeting the multifidus muscle, hypothesising that temporally coordinated central and peripheral stimulation will synergistically enhance the corticospinal drive to the lumbar spine and restore multifidus neuromuscular control, thereby alleviating pain and improving functional capacity in CLBP. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study will enrol 82 individuals diagnosed with CLBP between 18 and 65 years of age. Study participants will undergo randomisation into two parallel groups: the experimental arm receiving active PAS therapy (n=41) and the control arm receiving sham PAS treatment (n=41). The intervention protocol consists of 20 treatment sessions delivered across a 4-week timeframe, with participants attending five sessions weekly. Assessment time points are scheduled at study entry (baseline) and 4, 8 and 12 weeks following intervention initiation. The study's primary outcome is the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Secondary outcomes encompass the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ), Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36), Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Data analysis will adhere to the intention-to-treat methodology. Between-group comparisons across temporal measurement points will employ mixed-effects modelling approaches. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval for the research protocol was obtained from the Ethics Committee of Guanghua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (approval number: 2025-K-45), with trial registration completed in the China Clinical Trial Registry on 27 April 2025. On study completion, findings will be prepared for submission to peer-reviewed academic publications. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR2500101574.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.