Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41130680›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Cortical-multifidus paired associative stimulation for improving motor function in patients with chronic low back pain: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Hongyuan Lu, Quanwei Shao, Ji Guo, Zheng Huang, Yan-Jun Cao, Fei Li, Wenyao Li, Weiyi Xiong, Kun-Peng Li, Wei Feng

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Hongyuan Lu *Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine School of Rehabilitation Science, Shanghai, China.
Quanwei Shao *Yangpu District Central Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Ji Guo *Guanghua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Zheng HuangGuanghua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Yan-Jun CaoShanghai Fourth People's Hospital Affiliated to Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Fei LiSchool of Rehabilitation Medicine, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Wenyao LiFourth Rehabilitation Hospital of Shanghai, Shanghai, China.
Weiyi XiongShanghai Fourth People's Hospital Affiliated to Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Kun-Peng LiShanghai University of Sport School of Exercise and Health, Shanghai, China fwginger@126.com xyfyli@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4657-2405
Wei FengShanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine School of Rehabilitation Science, Shanghai, China fwginger@126.com xyfyli@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-6287-9768

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionChronic low back pain (CLBP) is characterised by multifaceted pathophysiology involving both central sensitisation and peripheral dysfunction. Conventional therapies often fail to address this complexity due to their unidimensional targets. Paired associative stimulation (PAS), a dual-target neuromodulatory approach that combines central and peripheral interventions, has demonstrated efficacy in enhancing motor recovery post-stroke by synchronously inducing corticospinal plasticity and peripheral neuromuscular adaptation. Building on this paradigm, we propose a novel combined primary motor cortex (M1) and multifidus muscle stimulation protocol. The intervention pairs transcranial magnetic stimulation over M1 with peripheral magnetic stimulation targeting the multifidus muscle, hypothesising that temporally coordinated central and peripheral stimulation will synergistically enhance the corticospinal drive to the lumbar spine and restore multifidus neuromuscular control, thereby alleviating pain and improving functional capacity in CLBP. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study will enrol 82 individuals diagnosed with CLBP between 18 and 65 years of age. Study participants will undergo randomisation into two parallel groups: the experimental arm receiving active PAS therapy (n=41) and the control arm receiving sham PAS treatment (n=41). The intervention protocol consists of 20 treatment sessions delivered across a 4-week timeframe, with participants attending five sessions weekly. Assessment time points are scheduled at study entry (baseline) and 4, 8 and 12 weeks following intervention initiation. The study's primary outcome is the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Secondary outcomes encompass the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ), Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36), Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Data analysis will adhere to the intention-to-treat methodology. Between-group comparisons across temporal measurement points will employ mixed-effects modelling approaches. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval for the research protocol was obtained from the Ethics Committee of Guanghua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (approval number: 2025-K-45), with trial registration completed in the China Clinical Trial Registry on 27 April 2025. On study completion, findings will be prepared for submission to peer-reviewed academic publications. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR2500101574.

Indexed as

Chronic PainLow Back PainMotor CortexParaspinal MusclesTranscranial Magnetic StimulationAdolescentAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultBack painChronic DiseaseClinical ProtocolsRandomized Controlled Trial

Identifiers

PMID41130680
PMCPMC12551486

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.