ArticleScientific reports2025
Impact and resiliency of the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic on healthcare providers and their household members.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has a significant impact on the health of healthcare providers and their families. The purpose of this study is to assess the impact of COVID-19 on the resiliency of frontline healthcare providers and their household members. A cross-sectional survey was conducted in 2 different medical centers. The Brief Resilience Scale (BRS) assessed resiliency, and the Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R) assessed subjective self-reported distress caused by traumatic events. Fisher tests was used hypothesis testing of differences in BRS and IES-R scores, between healthcare versus non-healthcare providers. Random forest models were used to identify the top contributors to BRS and IES-R scores. Participants also provided free text responses to describe main losses in social and support networks. A total of 1271 participants completed the surveys. The majority (95%) of the participants were self-identified healthcare providers. The mean (SD) BRS and IES-R score for non-healthcare providers (n = 63) were 20.1 (SD 5.2) and 24.0 (SD 16.4), respectively. The average score of IES-R indicated a concern for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). The average score of the BRS was under the range of normal resilience (18-25.9). There were no statistically significant differences in resiliency (p = 0.90) and impact of event (p = 0.59) between healthcare and non-healthcare provider household members. Having someone to confide in is one of the most important factors contributing to resiliency and impact of event. The average IES-R score suggested that all participants were impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic and demonstrated the same level of resiliency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.