Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41131081›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Three-dimensional nanofibrous PCL/gelatin scaffold fabricated using centrifugal force assisted wet electrospinning technique.

Sogand Abedi, Atieh Mohajeri, Soheila Zamanlui Benisi, Mohamad Pezeshki-Modaress, Salar Mohammadi Shabestari

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sogand AbediDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Basic Sciences, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, P.O. Box 13145-784, Tehran, Iran.
Atieh MohajeriDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Basic Sciences, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, P.O. Box 13145-784, Tehran, Iran.
Soheila Zamanlui BenisiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, CT.C., Islamic Azad University, P.O. Box 13185/768, Tehran, Iran. s.zamanlui.te@gmail.com.
Mohamad Pezeshki-ModaressBurn Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Salar Mohammadi ShabestariDepartment of Polymer, School of Chemical Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A three-dimensional (3D) scaffold that enables optimal cell-matrix interactions is essential for developing physiologically relevant neural tissue models. In this study, wet electrospinning was optimized to fabricate nanofibrous PCL/gelatin scaffolds with a well-controlled 3D architecture, using centrifugal force to tune scaffold morphology, porosity, and mechanical properties. The effects of centrifugal force intensity (5000 vs. 10,000 rpm) and application time (5 vs. 10 min) were systematically investigated. Scaffolds fabricated at 5000 rpm exhibited poor structural integrity and were excluded from further analysis. Among scaffolds produced at 10,000 rpm, blends of PCL/gelatin at 70:30 and 60:40 demonstrated excellent porosity (98.1 ± 1.9% and 97.3 ± 1.1%, respectively) and favorable fiber architecture. The 70:30-10 min scaffold achieved the highest tensile strength (57.03 ± 1.50 kPa) and modulus (53.00 ± 2.00 kPa), aligning with the physiological range of neural tissues. MTT assays confirmed robust biocompatibility, with C6 glial cell viability increasing by + 4.30% on the 70:30-10 min scaffold and + 5.88% on the 60:40-10 min scaffold over 14 days. Although the 70:30-5 min scaffold showed the highest proliferation (+ 12.16%), the 10-min variant was selected for detailed morphological evaluation due to its superior mechanical performance and structural uniformity. DAPI and H&E staining further validated the enhanced cell aggregation, ECM deposition, and neural-like morphology within the 70:30-10 min scaffold. These results collectively highlight the critical role of scaffold composition and processing parameters in engineering 3D neural tissue scaffolds, with the optimized 70:30-10 min scaffold emerging as a promising candidate for advanced neural tissue engineering applications.

Indexed as

GelatinNanofibersPolyestersTissue EngineeringTissue ScaffoldsAnimalsBiocompatible MaterialsCell LineCell SurvivalCentrifugationMaterials TestingPorosityRatsTensile StrengthBiocompatible MaterialsGelatinpolycaprolactonePolyesters3D scaffoldC6 glial cell lineCentrifugationNeural regenerationPorosityWet electrospinning

Identifiers

PMID41131081
PMCPMC12550067

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.