ArticleScientific reports2025
Three-dimensional nanofibrous PCL/gelatin scaffold fabricated using centrifugal force assisted wet electrospinning technique.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Magnetically responsive electrospun fibers as programmable bioactive scaffolds: From formulation design to magnetically triggered therapy and regeneration.Bioactive materials · 2027Review
- Comparison of penetration depth into dentinal tubules and push-out bond strength of zinc oxide and copper doped zinc oxide nanoparticles sealers : an in-vitro study.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Development of a pH-responsive starch-based nanocarrier polyacrylic acid containing SiOScientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A three-dimensional (3D) scaffold that enables optimal cell-matrix interactions is essential for developing physiologically relevant neural tissue models. In this study, wet electrospinning was optimized to fabricate nanofibrous PCL/gelatin scaffolds with a well-controlled 3D architecture, using centrifugal force to tune scaffold morphology, porosity, and mechanical properties. The effects of centrifugal force intensity (5000 vs. 10,000 rpm) and application time (5 vs. 10 min) were systematically investigated. Scaffolds fabricated at 5000 rpm exhibited poor structural integrity and were excluded from further analysis. Among scaffolds produced at 10,000 rpm, blends of PCL/gelatin at 70:30 and 60:40 demonstrated excellent porosity (98.1 ± 1.9% and 97.3 ± 1.1%, respectively) and favorable fiber architecture. The 70:30-10 min scaffold achieved the highest tensile strength (57.03 ± 1.50 kPa) and modulus (53.00 ± 2.00 kPa), aligning with the physiological range of neural tissues. MTT assays confirmed robust biocompatibility, with C6 glial cell viability increasing by + 4.30% on the 70:30-10 min scaffold and + 5.88% on the 60:40-10 min scaffold over 14 days. Although the 70:30-5 min scaffold showed the highest proliferation (+ 12.16%), the 10-min variant was selected for detailed morphological evaluation due to its superior mechanical performance and structural uniformity. DAPI and H&E staining further validated the enhanced cell aggregation, ECM deposition, and neural-like morphology within the 70:30-10 min scaffold. These results collectively highlight the critical role of scaffold composition and processing parameters in engineering 3D neural tissue scaffolds, with the optimized 70:30-10 min scaffold emerging as a promising candidate for advanced neural tissue engineering applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.