ArticleBMC gastroenterology2025
Enhancing explainability of random survival forests in predicting stent patency risk for malignant colonic obstruction.
Article in BMC gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThis study aims to enhance the explainability and predictive accuracy of the Random Survival Forest (RSF) algorithm in predicting stent patency risk for patients with malignant colonic obstruction.
methodsThe RSF algorithm was applied to clinical prognostic data of 109 patients with malignant colonic obstruction who underwent self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) procedures between September 2014 and October 2023. We combined the RSF variable importance and Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (Lasso) regression to identify the final predictive variables. And the performance of the RSF model was compared with the Cox Proportional Hazards (CPH) model using both global and local explanation methods.
resultsThe RSF model demonstrated superior predictive performance, with higher time-dependent AUCs and lower Brier scores compared to the CPH model across various time points. Significant predictors of stent patency identified by the RSF and Lasso models included Diabetes, CA199, Pre-Chemotherapy and Length of obstruction. The partial dependence plots highlighted CA199 and Length of obstruction as critical variables, with SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) and LIME (Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations) analyses further revealing the dynamic, time-varying impact of these variables on individual patient outcomes.
conclusionsThe RSF algorithm, supplemented with comprehensive feature importance analyses and advanced interpretability techniques, offers a robust and reliable framework for predicting stent patency risk in patients with malignant colonic obstruction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.