ArticleBMC infectious diseases2025
Lessons and concerns about the SARS-CoV-2/DENV co-infection.
Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Brazil has experienced frequent epidemic cycles of dengue virus infection over the past five decades. In addition, the country ranked among the most affected globally in terms of the number of cases and deaths caused by SARS-CoV-2 infection during 2020 and 2021, when the world faced the COVID-19 pandemic. Currently, a new dengue outbreak is underway, accompanied by a rising number of SARS-CoV-2 infections, which may lead to a severe collapse of the public health system. The primary aim of this retrospective cohort study was to investigate the occurrence of SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity in a panel of serum samples collected from patients presenting with clinical signs and symptoms of dengue virus infection in the Triângulo Mineiro Norte region, Minas Gerais State, Brazil. The period from January 2019 to April 2021 was selected to capture the dynamics across both the pre-pandemic and pandemic phases, prior to the implementation of the COVID-19 vaccination campaign. A total of 2,969 serum samples from patients residing in the region were analyzed using a Dengue IgM Capture ELISA and a COVID-19 IgG/IgM rapid test device. Although the primary diagnostic hypothesis for all samples was dengue infection, as the pandemic progressed, the number of SARS-CoV-2-positive samples surpassed that of dengue-positive samples. In conclusion, although both viral infections occurred independently, without an apparent causal relationship, our findings suggest that the true number of SARS-CoV-2 infections was significantly underestimated during the study period, thereby increasing the risk of severe COVID-19 outcomes, particularly in a population already experiencing co-infection with dengue virus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.