ArticlePlant biology (Stuttgart, Germany)2026
Do culturable seed endophyte communities differ between native and invasive Fabaceae sharing the same habitat?
Article in Plant biology (Stuttgart, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Invasive plant species threaten ecosystems by decreasing biodiversity and altering their functioning. Recent findings suggest that endophytes play a crucial role in germination and early seedling development, which may enhance plant invasion success. This study aimed to characterize the culturable seed endophytes of invasive Acacia spp. and coexisting Portuguese native Fabaceae (Erophaca baetica, Genista triacanthos, Retama monosperma, Stauracanthus genistoides and Ulex jussiaei) within two habitats: Dune and Forest. We compared seed microbial endophytes, their richness, diversity, and functional traits. Microbial communities were obtained through classical microbiology, followed by 16S rRNA and ITS region sequencing for identification. The most relevant functional traits were predicted using FAPROTAX and FungalTraits. A total of 150 isolates, 99 bacterial and 51 fungal, were identified. A distinct clustering of microbial communities was observed in Dune and Forest, indicating environment dependency. Invasive Acacia spp. had the richer and more diverse culturable microbiomes when compared with native species, acquiring a subset of microbial partners shared with natives. In Dune habitat, there was higher similarity of seed endophyte communities between Acacia and native plants than in Forest. Functional traits were more diverse in invasive than in native species, especially for bacteria; fungi had functions complementary to bacteria in all plant species. General functions were related to metabolism, biocontrol and hormonal growth promotion, which are beneficial traits that enhance germination. This study highlights the ability of Acacia spp. to acquire locally beneficial endophytes in invaded areas, which may enhance their invasion success.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.