Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41131729›Full record

ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2026

Subject grounding to reduce electromagnetic interference for MRI scanners operating in unshielded environments.

Beatrice Lena, Bart de Vos, Teresa Guallart-Naval, Javad Parsa, Pablo Garcia Cristobal, Ruben van den Broek, Chloé Najac, Joseba Alonso, Andrew Webb

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Beatrice LenaC.J. Gorter MRI Center, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9283-5918
Bart de VosC.J. Gorter MRI Center, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2697-5597
Teresa Guallart-NavalInstituto de Instrumentación para Imagen Molecular (I3M), Centro Mixto CSIC-Universitat Politècnica de València, Valencia, Spain.
Javad ParsaC.J. Gorter MRI Center, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0845-8492
Pablo Garcia CristobalInstituto de Instrumentación para Imagen Molecular (I3M), Centro Mixto CSIC-Universitat Politècnica de València, Valencia, Spain.
Ruben van den BroekC.J. Gorter MRI Center, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
Chloé NajacC.J. Gorter MRI Center, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7804-2281
Joseba AlonsoInstituto de Instrumentación para Imagen Molecular (I3M), Centro Mixto CSIC-Universitat Politècnica de València, Valencia, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2721-1380
Andrew WebbC.J. Gorter MRI Center, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.

Funding

Dutch Science Foundation Open Technology 18981Horizon 2020 ERC Advanced Grant 670629HORIZON EUROPE European Innovation Council EIC-Transition 101136407Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación y la Agencia Estatal de investigación PID2022-142719OB-C22
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePortable low-field (<0.1T) MRI is increasingly used for point-of-care imaging, but electromagnetic interference (EMI) presents a significant challenge, especially in unshielded environments. EMI can degrade image quality and compromise diagnostic utility. This study investigates whether subject grounding can effectively reduce EMI and improve image quality, comparing different grounding strategies.

methodsExperiments were conducted using a 47 mT Halbach-based MRI scanner with a single receive channel. Reproducibility was evaluated at a second site using a 72 mT scanner with similar geometry. Turbo spin echo sequences were used to image the hand and brain. Subject grounding was implemented using conductive cloth sleeves or electrocardiography (ECG) electrodes, each connected between the subject's skin and scanner ground. Three EMI conditions were tested: ambient, added single-frequency EMI, and broadband EMI. SNRs were calculated under each configuration.

resultsSubject grounding significantly reduced EMI in both hand and brain scans. In hand imaging, conductive sleeves reduced noise from 85× to 1.25× the 50-ohm noise floor. In brain imaging, grounding alone reduced noise from 55× to 25× baseline; when combined with arc RF shields, noise was further reduced to 1.2× baseline, even under added EMI. These results were reproducible across different scanners and locations.

conclusionSubject grounding is a simple, effective, and reproducible strategy for mitigating EMI in portable low-field MRI. It is especially effective for hand imaging, while brain imaging benefits from additional RF shielding. The approach is robust under various EMI conditions and may complement other denoising techniques.

Indexed as

Electromagnetic FieldsMagnetic Resonance ImagingArtifactsBrainEquipment DesignHandHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedPhantoms, ImagingReproducibility of ResultsSignal-To-Noise RatioEMI reductionlow field MRIreproducibilitysubject grounding

Identifiers

PMID41131729
PMCPMC12681293

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.