ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2026
Subject grounding to reduce electromagnetic interference for MRI scanners operating in unshielded environments.
Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Canine brain imaging with a new low-field portable (0.05 T) MRI scanner: a pilotThe veterinary quarterly · 2026Article
- Evaluation of a 0.05 T low-field MRI system for canine brain imaging via comparison with images acquired at 1.5 T field strength: a pilot cadaver study.The veterinary quarterly · 2026Article
- Feasibility of ultra-low-field MRI in an ion beam treatment room for online MR-guided particle therapy.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2026Article
- FENCE: Flexible Electric Noise Reduction Endo-Shield for the Suppression of Electromagnetic Interference in Low-Field MRI.NMR in biomedicine · 2026Article
- Electromagnetic Noise Characterization and Suppression in Low-Field MRI Systems.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- Subject grounding to reduce electromagnetic interference for MRI scanners operating in unshielded environments.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposePortable low-field (<0.1T) MRI is increasingly used for point-of-care imaging, but electromagnetic interference (EMI) presents a significant challenge, especially in unshielded environments. EMI can degrade image quality and compromise diagnostic utility. This study investigates whether subject grounding can effectively reduce EMI and improve image quality, comparing different grounding strategies.
methodsExperiments were conducted using a 47 mT Halbach-based MRI scanner with a single receive channel. Reproducibility was evaluated at a second site using a 72 mT scanner with similar geometry. Turbo spin echo sequences were used to image the hand and brain. Subject grounding was implemented using conductive cloth sleeves or electrocardiography (ECG) electrodes, each connected between the subject's skin and scanner ground. Three EMI conditions were tested: ambient, added single-frequency EMI, and broadband EMI. SNRs were calculated under each configuration.
resultsSubject grounding significantly reduced EMI in both hand and brain scans. In hand imaging, conductive sleeves reduced noise from 85× to 1.25× the 50-ohm noise floor. In brain imaging, grounding alone reduced noise from 55× to 25× baseline; when combined with arc RF shields, noise was further reduced to 1.2× baseline, even under added EMI. These results were reproducible across different scanners and locations.
conclusionSubject grounding is a simple, effective, and reproducible strategy for mitigating EMI in portable low-field MRI. It is especially effective for hand imaging, while brain imaging benefits from additional RF shielding. The approach is robust under various EMI conditions and may complement other denoising techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.