ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2025
Topological and functional characterization of human translation efficiency covariation network.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Translational buffering tunes gene expression in mice and humans.Genome biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationGene co-expression networks based on RNA abundance have identified genes with shared biological functions, common regulatory elements, and physical interactions among their protein products. Although thousands of ribosome profiling datasets are publicly available, they have not been leveraged to construct networks to characterize translation efficiency covariation (TEC) to quantify how translation of different transcripts co-varies across conditions.
resultsWe construct and analyze a human TEC network, revealing topological and functional properties distinct from RNA co-expression networks. The TEC network displays modular structure, small-world characteristics, and rich-club organization but differs substantially in node connectivity and neighborhood composition. Comparative analyses show that genes such as PKM, which are central in the TEC network due to their role in translational regulation, are peripheral in RNA co-expression networks. Tissue-specific TEC networks further uncover context-dependent translation patterns. These results suggest that TEC networks provide a complementary framework for understanding gene regulation. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The code for this study is archived on https://zenodo.org/records/17275939 and publicly available at https://github.com/CenikLab/TEC-Network-Analyses. The associated data can be accessed at https://zenodo.org/records/17275970.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.