Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41132354›Full record

ReviewTranslational andrology and urology2025

Research progress on ejaculatory function preservation in minimally invasive surgical treatments for benign prostatic hyperplasia: a narrative review.

Zhao Luo, Guihua Chen, Chao Niu, Young Beom Jeong, Sung Chul Kam, Yu Seob Shin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Translational andrology and urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Zhao Luo *Department of Urology, Shenzhen Qianhai Taikang Hospital, Shenzhen, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-7807-6296
Guihua Chen *Department of Biomedical Sciences, Institute for Medical Science, Jeonbuk National University Medical School, Jeonju, Jeollabuk-do, Korea.
Chao NiuDepartment of Urology, Shenzhen Qianhai Taikang Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Young Beom JeongDepartment of Urology, Jeonbuk National University Medical School, Research Institute of Clinical Medicine of Jeonbuk National University-Biomedical Research Institute of Jeonbuk National University Hospital, Jeonju, Jeollabuk-do, Korea.
Sung Chul KamDepartment of Urology, Gyeongsang National University College of Medicine, and Institute of Health Sciences of Gyeongsang National University, Jinju, Gyeongsangnam-do, Korea.
Yu Seob ShinDepartment of Urology, Jeonbuk National University Medical School, Research Institute of Clinical Medicine of Jeonbuk National University-Biomedical Research Institute of Jeonbuk National University Hospital, Jeonju, Jeollabuk-do, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1126-3821

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objective: As the treatment paradigm for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) shifts from solely relieving lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) to emphasizing quality of life and preservation of sexual function, minimally invasive surgical therapies (MISTs) have emerged as promising options for preserving ejaculatory function postoperatively. This review aims to summarize the technical features and evidence base of major MISTs, including prostatic urethral lift (PUL), prostatic artery embolization (PAE), water vapor thermal therapy (WVTT, Rezum), Aquablation, and robot-assisted simple prostatectomy (RASP), with a focus on their ability to preserve ejaculatory function. Methods: A structured literature review was conducted to identify representative studies on MISTs for BPH, with an emphasis on clinical indicators such as urinary symptom relief and preservation of ejaculatory function. Key data were extracted and summarized in a comparative table including surgical technique, efficacy, functional outcomes, advantages, disadvantages, and patient selection criteria. To assess the research attention and evidence strength of each technique, a stacked bar chart was generated illustrating the number of representative and other relevant studies per technique. Data extraction was performed independently by two reviewers and cross-checked to ensure accuracy. Key Content and Findings: Evidence indicates significant differences among MISTs in balancing urinary efficacy with preservation of ejaculatory function. Techniques such as PUL and PAE, which minimize interference with midline prostatic structures, demonstrate higher rates of ejaculatory function preservation. Rezum and Aquablation also achieve functional preservation through targeted treatment, avoiding the verumontanum. Modified RASP techniques offer new structural-sparing strategies in large glands. Despite these advantages over traditional surgery, the current evidence base is limited by small sample sizes, short follow-up periods, and heterogeneity in outcome measures. Conclusions: Future research should prioritize large-scale, multicenter randomized controlled trials with standardized evaluation of ejaculatory function to support the development of function-preserving treatment strategies. Urologists should tailor interventions based on individual patient needs while balancing symptom relief with functional outcomes to achieve patient-centered, precision therapy.

Indexed as

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH)ejaculatory function preservationminimally invasive surgical therapies (MISTs)

Identifiers

PMID41132354
PMCPMC12541510

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.