Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41132395›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in digital health2025

Digital home-based multimodal prehabilitation of colorectal cancer patients prior to surgery (the dHOPE study): a non-inferiority clinical trial protocol.

Guro Kleve, Chiara Dalla Santa, Felicia Kristiansen, Marita Tegnander, Victoria Buch, Cecilie Steen Hagemann, Marianne Helgheim, Parasto Engene, Henri Pesonen, Maiken Kojen Kleveland and 19 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06231576 (Digital Home-Based Prehabilitation Before Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06231576 nanot yet recruitingnot on this map

Digital Home-Based Prehabilitation Before Surgery

TypeinterventionalSponsorVestre Viken Hospital TrustRan2024 to 2030Enrolled140ConditionsCancer Colorectal, Frailty, SurgeryArmsPrehabilitation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Nutritional prehabilitation strategies in abdominal surgery.Current opinion in clinical nutrition and metabolic care · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

29 authors.

Guro KleveDepartment of Surgery, Bærum Hospital Vestre Viken Hospital Trust, Gjettum, Norway.
Chiara Dalla SantaCentre for Embryology and Healthy Development (CRESCO), Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Felicia KristiansenDepartment of Surgery, Bærum Hospital Vestre Viken Hospital Trust, Gjettum, Norway.
Marita TegnanderDepartment of Surgery, Bærum Hospital Vestre Viken Hospital Trust, Gjettum, Norway.
Victoria BuchDepartment of Surgery, Bærum Hospital Vestre Viken Hospital Trust, Gjettum, Norway.
Cecilie Steen HagemannDepartment of Internal Medicine, Bærum Hospital Vestre Viken Hospital Trust, Gjettum, Norway.
Marianne HelgheimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Bærum Hospital Vestre Viken Hospital Trust, Gjettum, Norway.
Parasto EngeneDepartment of Internal Medicine, Bærum Hospital Vestre Viken Hospital Trust, Gjettum, Norway.
Henri PesonenDepartment of Biostatistics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Maiken Kojen KlevelandDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Vestre Viken Hospital Trust, Bærum, Norway.
Greta Lyster HvervenDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Vestre Viken Hospital Trust, Bærum, Norway.
Tormod Skogstad NilsenDepartment of Physical Performance, The Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, Oslo, Norway.
Mathyn Adrianus Marinus VervaartDepartment of Health Management and Health Economics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Helle AanesenAKTIV Against Cancer, Oslo, Norway.
Kari Thune UglaneDepartment of Internal Medicine, Bærum Hospital Vestre Viken Hospital Trust, Gjettum, Norway.
Mona BjellandThe Norwegian Cancer Society, Oslo, Norway.
Raphaël ZoryUniversité Côte d'Azur, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Clinique Gériatrique du Cerveau et du Mouvement, Nice, France.
Frédéric ChorinUniversité Côte d'Azur, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Clinique Gériatrique du Cerveau et du Mouvement, Nice, France.
Victoire Cardot-RuffinoMolecular Oncology Team, UMR 144, Institut Curie, Paris, France.
Eva Ester Molina BeltranMolecular Oncology Team, UMR 144, Institut Curie, Paris, France.
Cindy NeuzilletMolecular Oncology Team, UMR 144, Institut Curie, Paris, France.
Mette SoerensenDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Juulia JylhäväDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Irantzu AnzarApplied Mathematics for Biomedical Research Institute, Ambr Institute AS, Oslo, Norway.
Valentin André NormandApplied Mathematics for Biomedical Research Institute, Ambr Institute AS, Oslo, Norway.
Marius MyrstadDepartment of Internal Medicine, Bærum Hospital Vestre Viken Hospital Trust, Gjettum, Norway.
Arne KlunglandCentre for Embryology and Healthy Development (CRESCO), Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Hilde Loge NilsenCentre for Embryology and Healthy Development (CRESCO), Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Rune OuglandDepartment of Surgery, Bærum Hospital Vestre Viken Hospital Trust, Gjettum, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Cancer surgery is associated with risk of complications and loss of function. Vulnerability factors, such as advanced age, malnutrition, smoking, comorbidity, frailty, and low socioeconomic status increase the risk. Lifestyle intervention prior to surgery, known as prehabilitation, often include physical activity, nutritional support, psychological coaching, and smoking cessation, increase functional reserves and reduce postoperative complications. Most importantly, it prevents loss of functional capacity and dependence. Methods: The dHOPE study is a three-armed, open-labelled, parallel-group randomized controlled trial (RCT) with non-inferiority design to compare a digital home-based prehabilitation program with a hospital-based program or no organized prehabilitation. In addition, the dHOPE study aims to identify measurable parameters reflecting the effect of prehabilitation, thus preparing for future personalization of the prehabilitation programs. Discussion: The feasibility of multimodal prehabilitation is threatened by low compliance to hospital-based programs due to burdensome commuting, even in central and metropolitan areas. In sparsely populated countries, this challenge is even more pronounced. To ensure equal healthcare to all citizens regardless of address or economic situation, there is a need to transfer the prehabilitation program to the patients' homes. Thus, the primary hypothesis of dHOPE is that a digital home-based program is not inferior to a hospital-based program. Moreover, given the patient diversity, prehabilitation must be personalized to meet individual profiles or needs. An exploratory subtask of dHOPE is to confirm the utility of clinical, genetic, and molecular factors in evaluating prehabilitation response ultimately to identify new biomarkers and develop medical software for individual risk stratification and development of personalized prehabilitation programs. Clinical Trial registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/, identifier (NCT06231576).

Indexed as

colorectal cancerdecentralized healthcaredigitalizationexercise trainingnutritionpersonalized medicineprehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID41132395
PMCPMC12540316

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.