ArticleTrauma surgery & acute care open2025
Conference proceedings for the 2025 Design for Implementation: The Future of Trauma Research and Clinical Guidance Conference Series.
Article in Trauma surgery & acute care open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The second Design for Implementation (DFI): The Future of Trauma Research and Clinical Guidance Conference gathered experts from diverse sectors to advance trauma clinical guidance design and implementation. Building on the previous year's minimum viable product, this conference progressed from conceptualization to design phase, focusing on creating scalable, sustainable solutions for trauma clinical guidance. Participants explored innovative approaches addressing critical challenges in trauma care, including interorganizational collaboration, resource-adaptable guidance, and patient-centered design. The conference highlighted the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance guidance development and maintain clinical expertise and ethical standards. A key advancement was the refinement of a central repository containing 258 guidance documents in the form of an app with improved accessibility features. Discussions emphasized the importance of implementation science principles, advocating for leadership engagement, maintaining academic recognition for guidance contributions, and continuous outcome tracking. The proposed 12-step guidance development process integrates AI capabilities and preserving clinician expertise. Patient voices and lived experiences were emphasized as essential elements in developing trauma-informed systems, with powerful testimonials from trauma survivors illustrating the critical need for comprehensive support services. Participants agreed that practical guidance must be contextually relevant, properly vetted, and integrate seamlessly with electronic health records. The conference concluded with plans to secure sustainable funding, formalize partnerships, and engage broader communities. The DFI series will continue in February 2026, focusing on testing and implementing innovative solutions to advance trauma care and improve patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.