ReviewThe Lancet regional health. Europe2025
Mental health in Central and Eastern Europe: a comprehensive analysis.
Review in The Lancet regional health. Europe, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Case study: The DBT implementation journey of dialectical behaviour therapy in five European countries.Borderline personality disorder and emotion dysregulation · 2026Article
- The evolution of suicide mortality in Europe: decline with persistent disparities in an age-period-cohort analysis.Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences · 2026Article
- Cost Burden, Readmission Dynamics, and Service Management in Psychiatric Care: A Financial Performance Analysis in a Romanian Public Hospital.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- The First Telementoring Programme in Latvia: A Qualitative Study of the "ECHO School of Psychiatry" for General Practitioners.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Gender inequalities and the burden of anorexia and bulimia in Europe, 1990-2023: findings from the global burden of disease study 2023.European journal of public health · 2026Article
- From one-time visits to long-term therapy: patterns of psychological help-seeking.BMC psychology · 2026Article
- Mental health help-seeking behavior among Ukrainian adults during the 2nd year of the 2022 Russian invasion: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Trends in self-reported lifetime diagnosed depression and health behaviours in Poland, 2019/2020-2023/2024: a repeated cross-sectional study of 1.2 million adults.BMJ public health · 2026Article
- Reflections on Institutional Corruption in Mental Health Policy Implementation: Global Insights and the Eastern European Experience.Health and human rights · 2025Article
- Building unified, resilient mental health systems in a diverse Europe.The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
43 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The post-communist WHO European region, often called Central and Eastern Europe (CEE), includes 28 countries with over 770 million people. Mental health systems remain shaped by the communist legacy of centralized institutions, a narrow biomedical focus, and neglect of social and psychological dimensions. Chronic underfunding persists, further strained by shrinking civic space in some countries and the war in Ukraine. Substantial progress has been made in the past decade, with modernization and rights-based approaches gaining ground. Yet reforms face entrenched barriers: underinvestment disproportionate to the burden; pervasive stigma, weak advocacy, and limited involvement of people with lived experience; dominance of institutional care over prevention, promotion, and community services; reliance on donor-driven projects that falter once funding ends; and human resource problems. Governance is often unstable, with low prioritization, clientelism, and personal biases undermining reforms. Research and data remain scarce, leaving systems unevaluated and vulnerable to reversal. Poor decision-making compounds these barriers: systemic missteps, driven by limited expertise, weak evidence, and personal biases, prevent resources from achieving the best possible outcomes. To move forward, CEE must integrate health, social, and education systems, secure sustainable crisis services, strengthen professional skills, involve people with lived experience, expand public mental health expertise, and, above all, commit greater and more transparent investment, closer to western European levels, if resilient and effective systems are to be built.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.