Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41132773›Full record

ReviewThe Lancet regional health. Europe2025

Mental health service coverage and gaps among adults in Europe: a systematic review.

Corrado Barbui, Jordi Alonso, Dan Chisholm, Sara Evans-Lacko, Roxanne C Keynejad, Ledia Lazeri, Numan Miah, Zivile Valuckiene, Chiara Gastaldon

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Lancet regional health. Europe, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Corrado BarbuiWHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Training in Mental Health and Service Evaluation, Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, Section of Psychiatry, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Jordi AlonsoHealth Services Research Group, Hospital del Mar Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain.
Dan ChisholmDepartment of Mental Health, Brain Health and Substance Use, World Health Organization (WHO), Geneva, Switzerland.
Sara Evans-LackoCare Policy and Evaluation Centre, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.
Roxanne C KeynejadHealth Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Ledia LazeriWorld Health Organization (WHO) Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Numan MiahGlobal Mental Health Peer Network, Newcastle, UK.
Zivile ValuckieneGlobal Mental Health Peer Network (Kaunas), Institute of Hygiene (Vilnius), Lithuania.
Chiara GastaldonWHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Training in Mental Health and Service Evaluation, Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, Section of Psychiatry, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ensuring the right to the highest attainable standard of mental healthcare requires a clear understanding of the current state of service coverage and gaps across Europe. Given the wide heterogeneity of health systems and resources, systematically assessing these gaps is crucial in order to identify inequities, inform policy and guide efforts to strengthen care at regional and national levels. In this Series paper, we systematically reviewed 45 studies reporting 198 national or sub-national estimates of adult mental health service coverage and treatment gaps in the World Health Organization (WHO) European Region. Data were scarce for many countries and conditions, heterogeneous in definitions, and rarely longitudinal, limiting comparability and trend analysis. Coverage for psychotic disorders was generally higher, often exceeding 90% in some countries but varied widely. For major depressive disorder, minimally adequate treatment ranged from below 10% in Bulgaria, Tajikistan and Turkmenistan to over 35% in Germany and Czechia. Anxiety disorder coverage ranged from 7% in Bulgaria to 47% in Sweden; most substance use disorder estimates were under 15%, and adult ADHD coverage was typically below 10%, based on outdated data. Trend analyses indicated minimal increases in depression coverage over two decades and mixed patterns for psychosis. Marginalised groups, including refugees, homeless populations and sexual minorities, faced the largest gaps, sometimes exceeding 80%. The lack of standardised, repeated measures hampers tracking of progress toward WHO's 2030 goal of a 50% increase in coverage. We advocate that harmonised monitoring systems, with attention to treatment adequacy and equity, are urgently needed to close persistent mental health care gaps across Europe.

Indexed as

Coverage gapEuropeMental healthTreatment gap

Identifiers

PMID41132773
PMCPMC12541639

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.