Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41132801›Full record

ArticleJournal of ophthalmology2025

Keratoconus: A Probe Into the Refractive Symmetry.

Sankhajyoti Saha, Moubani Dutta, Soumendra Nath Bandyopadhyay, Pratyay Ranjan Dutta, Agnihiya Bosu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sankhajyoti SahaDepartment of Health Science, NSHM Knowledge Campus, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-6246-3859
Moubani DuttaDepartment of Health Science, NSHM Knowledge Campus, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-1013-3636
Soumendra Nath BandyopadhyayDepartment of Health Science, NSHM Knowledge Campus, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8302-3387
Pratyay Ranjan DuttaDepartment of Computing and Analytics, NSHM Knowledge Campus, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-7139-3742
Agnihiya BosuDepartment of Economics, National University, Gazipur, Bangladesh.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-6024-4605

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: A debilitating corneal ectasia, designated as keratoconus, often leads to distorted and obscured vision, and greater reactivity to light. Inevitably, the cornea becomes thinner and protrudes outward forming a cone-like configuration. The research hypothesis is initiated to estimate the reliability of the mirror symmetry and the dimensions of keratoconus severity, prospecting that mirror octant possessed a significant impact on the trajectory of the disorder. Methods: This study included patients with clinically diagnosed with bilateral keratoconus and bilateral astigmatism. Mirror symmetry or enantiomorphism was quantified employing the refractive cylindrical notations of yoke eye. Pentacam enable the observation of keratoconus severity utilizing corneal thickness, average corneal thinning, and asphericity coefficient. Multiple Result: With a significant ( Conclusions: Mirror symmetry's applicability may be inadequate by its subservience on corneal contour analysis, which, although obliging, may abstruse other salient clinical considerations. With 35.6% of the model variability, it indicates a room for improvement by adding nonlinear predictors to enhance the model.

Indexed as

asphericity coefficientcorneal dioptercorneal thicknesskeratoconusmirror symmetry

Identifiers

PMID41132801
PMCPMC12543452

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.