Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41132821›Full record

ArticleGlobal advances in integrative medicine and health

Randomized Controlled Trial of Acoustic Neuromodulation to Enhance Well-Being in Healthcare Workers.

Catherine L Tegeler, Heidi Munger Clary, Hossam A Shaltout, Gregory B Russell, Suzanne C Danhauer, Charles H Tegeler

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global advances in integrative medicine and health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04682197 (Cereset Research To Reduce Stress In Healthcare Workers In The Time Of COVID-19), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04682197 nacompletednot on this map

Cereset Research To Reduce Stress In Healthcare Workers In The Time Of COVID-19

TypeinterventionalSponsorWake Forest University Health SciencesRan2021 to 2023Enrolled144ConditionsHealth Personnel, Stress, Anxiety, InsomniaArmsCereset Research
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Catherine L TegelerDepartment of Neurology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine (WFUSM), Winston-Salem, NC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2943-6719
Heidi Munger ClaryDepartment of Neurology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine (WFUSM), Winston-Salem, NC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9889-8351
Hossam A ShaltoutHypertension and Vascular Research Center, WFUSM, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7948-3815
Gregory B RussellDepartment of Biostatistics and Data Science, WFUSM, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Suzanne C DanhauerDepartment of Social Sciences & Health Policy, Division of Public Health Sciences, WFUSM, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2003-9805
Charles H TegelerDepartment of Neurology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine (WFUSM), Winston-Salem, NC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8654-8661

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Increased stress in healthcare workers (HCW) is a global crisis and few brief, scalable interventions exist to support HCW with stress, anxiety, and insomnia. Individual interventions impacting these multiple symptoms are needed. Objective: To determine whether a noninvasive brainwave echoing acoustic neuromodulation intervention reduces perceived stress among HCW compared to waitlist control. Methods: This was a parallel randomized controlled trial of acoustic neuromodulation vs waitlist control conducted at a large academic health system. Adult HCW with Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) ≥14 were included. Exclusions were factors that would compromise intervention delivery or current engagement with similar interventions. The intervention was a limited dose paradigm of Cereset Research™ Standard Operating Procedures, a noninvasive, closed-loop, brainwave echoing acoustic neuromodulation neurotechnology, composed of four, 36-minute acoustic neuromodulation sessions over 2 weeks. The primary outcome was change in PSS at 6-8 weeks. Secondary outcomes were anxiety (Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7) and insomnia (Insomnia Severity Index). Exploratory outcomes included validated measures of depression, fatigue, and subjective cognition. Group-level changes in outcomes were evaluated using linear mixed models. Results: Of 144 participants (72 per group), 134 completed primary outcome assessment (67 per group). Participants had mean age 44.7 years [SD 11.6] and were 86.1% female (N = 124). Intention-to-treat analyses demonstrated mean PSS score reduction of 7.8 (SD 5.9) in the intervention group vs 1.2 (SD 4.1) among controls (difference between groups 6.6 points, 95% CI 4.9-8.2, Conclusions: In HCW with elevated stress, acoustic neuromodulation resulted in clinically meaningful improvements in perceived stress, anxiety, and insomnia. The intervention is safe, scalable, and may merit adoption by health systems to complement organization-level approaches for enhancing HCW well-being. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04682197.

Indexed as

acoustic neuromodulationanxietyCereset Researchhealthcare workersinsomniaperceived stress

Identifiers

PMID41132821
PMCPMC12541175

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.