ArticleFrontiers in neurology2025
CTA and DSA based computational fluid dynamics models for morphological and hemodynamic assessment of intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploratory analysis of morphology-hemodynamics-perfusion relationships after intracranial stenting in severe intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Article
- Noninvasive MRA-derived fractional flow for intracranial stenosis: methodological evaluation and hemodynamic insights.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS) is a primary cause of ischemic stroke. Accurate assessment of anatomical and hemodynamic characteristics is crucial for treatment planning, yet current clinical evaluation primarily relies on luminal stenosis. Objective: This study aims to compare computational fluid dynamics (CFD) models based on digital subtraction angiography (DSA), computed tomography angiography (CTA) and CTA model incorporating DSA hemodynamic information (CMD) integrating DSA flow data with CTA morphological structure, evaluating their differences and consistency in ICAS assessment. Methods: 40 ICAS patients who underwent CTA and DSA were retrospectively included. Patient-specific CFD simulations were performed using standardized boundary conditions to assess morphological data and hemodynamic parameters, including pressure ratio, wall shear stress ratio, and high shear stress areas. Statistical analyses included paired comparisons, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), and Bland-Altman analysis. Results: CTA-based models demonstrated excellent consistency with DSA in anatomical measurements (ICC > 0.90). The CMD approach enhanced consistency in functional metrics, with CMD-derived PR and WSSR highly concordant with DSA results. When using CTA alone, WSSR was slightly underestimated, particularly in middle artery lesions. Subgroup analysis indicated that lesion location significantly influences flow and shear stress patterns. Conclusion: CTA-based CFD modeling serves as a reliable non-invasive alternative to DSA for morphological ICAS assessment. The CMD method further improves the accuracy of functional evaluation by integrating flow data. These findings support the integration of anatomical imaging with hemodynamic modeling to enhance the clinical potential for stroke risk stratification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.