Evidence mapPaperPMID 41133177Full record

ArticleWomen's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.)2025

Sensor-Derived Glycemic Metrics in Women with Type 1 Diabetes Using Insulin Degludec Versus Other Basal Insulin Analogs During Pregnancy-A Post Hoc Analysis of the CopenFast Trial.

Julie C Søholm, Sidse K Nørgaard, Kirsten Nørgaard, Tine D Clausen, Peter Damm, Elisabeth R Mathiesen, Lene Ringholm

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Julie C SøholmCenter for Pregnant Women with Diabetes, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Sidse K NørgaardCenter for Pregnant Women with Diabetes, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Kirsten NørgaardDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Tine D ClausenCenter for Pregnant Women with Diabetes, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Peter DammCenter for Pregnant Women with Diabetes, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Elisabeth R MathiesenCenter for Pregnant Women with Diabetes, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Lene RingholmCenter for Pregnant Women with Diabetes, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: To explore sensor-derived glycemic metrics during pregnancy in women with type 1 diabetes using insulin degludec or other basal insulin analogs. Methods: A post hoc analysis of 87 pregnant women with type 1 diabetes using intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring and multiple daily injections, including basal insulin analogs in the CopenFast trial. Glycemic metrics, including mean sensor glucose, time in range (TIRp, 3.5-7.8 mmol/L), and time below range in pregnancy (TBRp, <3.5 mmol/L), were assessed from periconception to 37 completed weeks. Results: In total, 58 women used degludec and 29 women used other basal insulin analogs. At baseline (median = 9.5 gestational weeks, interquartile range = 9.0-11.0), hemoglobin A1c was 50 ± 9 versus 46 ± 6 ( Conclusions: In this post hoc analysis, pregnant women with type 1 diabetes using degludec achieved lower nighttime TIRp, experienced less severe hypoglycemia, and delivered infants who were heavier and thereby had less appropriate size compared with women using other basal insulin analogs.

Indexed as

basal insulin analogcontinuous glucose monitoringhypoglycemiapregnancytype 1 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID41133177
PMCPMC12543421

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.