Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41133192›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2025

Impact of different production systems on the slaughter performance and meat quality of gayal (

Li Zhi, Qing Li, Zibei Wang, Meng Zhang, Shichun He, Hao Zhang, Sifan Dai, Lijuan Zhang, Shusheng Zhao, Feng Jiang and 6 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Li ZhiKey Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science of Yunnan Province, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming, China.
Qing LiKey Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science of Yunnan Province, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming, China.
Zibei WangKey Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science of Yunnan Province, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming, China.
Meng ZhangKey Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science of Yunnan Province, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming, China.
Shichun HeKey Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science of Yunnan Province, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming, China.
Hao ZhangKey Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science of Yunnan Province, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming, China.
Sifan DaiKey Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science of Yunnan Province, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming, China.
Lijuan ZhangKey Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science of Yunnan Province, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming, China.
Shusheng ZhaoKey Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science of Yunnan Province, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming, China.
Feng JiangKey Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science of Yunnan Province, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming, China.
Lixing WangAnimal Husbandry Station of Yunnan Province, Kunming, China.
Sheng HeAnimal Husbandry Technology Extension Station of Nujiang Lisu Autonomous Prefecture, Lushui, China.
Dingfu KangYunnan Tengsen Investment Group Limited, Tengchong, China.
Chengming DuanLivestock Work Station of Tengchong City, Tengchong, China.
Maosheng YangLivestock Work Station of Tengchong City, Tengchong, China.
Huaming MaoKey Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science of Yunnan Province, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of different production systems, including low-altitude indoor feeding, high-altitude indoor feeding, and high-altitude grazing, on the slaughter performance and meat quality of gayals. Methods: We slaughtered 15 male gayals (five from each of three feedlots) that were randomly selected, with similar body weights within each feedlot. The gayals were raised under different production systems: indoor feeding at 1,325 m (TC, Tengchong feedlot; Results: The results indicated that compared with the other two groups, the TC group exhibited significantly greater slaughter performance, including dressing percentage, lean meat percentage, and meat: bone ratio ( Conclusion: Low-altitude indoor-fed gayals demonstrated superior slaughter performance and higher beef yield, whereas high-altitude grazed gayals produced beef with a more favorable fatty acid profile and enhanced flavor-related amino acids, despite exhibiting lower productivity. High-altitude indoor-fed gayals exhibited slaughter performance and meat quality indicators that were intermediate between the two systems.

Indexed as

altitudedifferent production systemsgayalmeat qualityslaughter performance

Identifiers

PMID41133192
PMCPMC12541416

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.