ReviewMedical sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Reproducibility Examination of Histopathological Growth Patterns of Liver Metastases in a Retrospective, Consecutive, Single-Center, Cohort Study with Literature Review.
Review in Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesHistopathological growth patterns (HGPs) of liver metastases have been shown to possess prognostic significance. To date, only 2 studies have evaluated the reproducibility of HGP assessment. The aim of our study was to assess the interobserver reproducibility of HGP classification in liver metastases.
methodsA retrospective, consecutive, single-center cohort study was conducted, including patients who underwent surgical resection for liver metastases at the University of Szeged between 2011 and 2023. A comprehensive database was established, incorporating basic histopathological data for each case. Histological slides were independently reviewed by 2 pathologists, 3 pathology specialist trainees, and 2 medical students with varying levels of experience in gastrointestinal pathology. Interobserver agreement was evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and Fleiss' kappa.
resultsThe study included resection specimens from 205 patients, comprising 336 metastatic lesions, predominantly of gastrointestinal origin (
conclusionsOur findings demonstrate that HGPs can be reliably assessed by individuals with at least 2 years of experience in general pathology. To our knowledge, this is the first study to include the largest number of board-certified pathologists and pathology specialist trainees in a HGP reproducibility analysis. Additionally, no comprehensive literature review on this topic has been previously conducted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.