Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41133607›Full record

ArticleVision (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Oculomotor Training Improves Reading and Associated Cognitive Functions in Children with Learning Difficulties: A Pilot Study.

Alessio Facchin, Silvio Maffioletti, Marta Maffioletti, Gabriele Esposito, Marta Bonetti, Luisa Girelli, Roberta Daini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vision (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alessio FacchinDepartment of Human and Social Sciences, Mercatorum University, 00186 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0604-5029
Silvio MaffiolettiInstitute of Research and Studies in Optics and Optometry, 50059 Vinci, Italy.
Marta MaffiolettiLeonardo da Vinci Study Center, 24127 Bergamo, Italy.
Gabriele EspositoProspettiva Medical Center, 24124 Bergamo, Italy.
Marta BonettiProspettiva Medical Center, 24124 Bergamo, Italy.
Luisa GirelliDepartment of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2186-242X
Roberta DainiDepartment of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1055-8353

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the first years of schooling, inefficient eye movements can impair the development of reading skills. Nonetheless, the improvement of these abilities has been little investigated in children. This pilot study aimed to verify the effectiveness of Office Based Oculomotor Training (OBOT) in enhancing reading skills in 'poor' readers. Twenty-one children (aged 7-12 years) underwent an assessment of reading, visual, and perceptual abilities before and after a training of oculomotor skills (i.e., execution of saccadic movements with symbol charts in various modes and types; 14 participants) or a simple reading exercise (7 participants). The overall duration of the training was six weeks. The results showed a specific improvement, in the group subjected to oculomotor training only, not only in oculomotor abilities but also in reading, visuo-perceptual skills, and the ability to resolve crowding. These primary results suggest that the improvement of oculomotor abilities can lead to an indirect increase in reading in developmental age.

Indexed as

DEM testdyslexiaeye movementsoculomotor trainingreadingreading difficultiessaccades

Identifiers

PMID41133607
PMCPMC12551072

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.