Evidence mapPaperPMID 41134426Full record

ArticleNeurochemical research2025

Protective Effects of Eugenia uniflora Red Fruit on Brain in a Rat Model of Type 2 Diabetes: Mechanistic Insights.

Imtiaz Ahmad, Juliane de Souza Cardoso, Julia Eisenhardt de Mello, Fernanda Cardoso Teixeira, Juliane Torchelsen Saraiva, Natália Pontes Bona, Marcia Vizzotto, Lucas Petitemberte de Souza, William Borges Domingues, Vinicius Farias Campos and 5 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neurochemical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Imtiaz Ahmad *Laboratório de Biomarcadores, Centro de Ciências Químicas, Farmacêuticas e de Alimentos, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, RS, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9551-0323
Juliane de Souza Cardoso *Laboratório de Biomarcadores, Centro de Ciências Químicas, Farmacêuticas e de Alimentos, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, RS, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2726-4159
Julia Eisenhardt de MelloLaboratório de Neuroquímica, Inflamação e Câncer, Centro de Ciências Químicas, Farmacêuticas e de Alimentos, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, RS, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-1461-7063
Fernanda Cardoso TeixeiraLaboratório de Neuroquímica, Inflamação e Câncer, Centro de Ciências Químicas, Farmacêuticas e de Alimentos, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, RS, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9195-981X
Juliane Torchelsen SaraivaLaboratório de Biomarcadores, Centro de Ciências Químicas, Farmacêuticas e de Alimentos, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, RS, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-7124-5183
Natália Pontes BonaLaboratório de Biomarcadores, Centro de Ciências Químicas, Farmacêuticas e de Alimentos, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, RS, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5944-1968
Marcia VizzottoEmpresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária, Centro de Pesquisa Agropecuária de Clima Temperado, Pelotas, RS, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8071-4980
Lucas Petitemberte de SouzaLaboratório de Genômica Estrutural, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biotecnologia, Centro de Desenvolvimento Tecnológico, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, RS, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2308-4334
William Borges DominguesLaboratório de Genômica Estrutural, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biotecnologia, Centro de Desenvolvimento Tecnológico, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, RS, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4351-2271
Vinicius Farias CamposLaboratório de Genômica Estrutural, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biotecnologia, Centro de Desenvolvimento Tecnológico, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, RS, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2119-293X
Claiton Leoneti LencinaLaboratório de Biomarcadores, Centro de Ciências Químicas, Farmacêuticas e de Alimentos, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, RS, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8138-1073
Roselia Maria SpanevelloLaboratório de Neuroquímica, Inflamação e Câncer, Centro de Ciências Químicas, Farmacêuticas e de Alimentos, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, RS, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5117-2000
Rejane Giacomelli TavaresLaboratório de Biomarcadores, Centro de Ciências Químicas, Farmacêuticas e de Alimentos, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, RS, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9806-1893
Mayara Sandrielly Soares de AguiarLaboratório de Neuroquímica, Inflamação e Câncer, Centro de Ciências Químicas, Farmacêuticas e de Alimentos, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, RS, Brazil. mayara.soares@ufpel.edu.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2181-3591
Francieli Moro StefanelloLaboratório de Biomarcadores, Centro de Ciências Químicas, Farmacêuticas e de Alimentos, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, RS, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5945-3723

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current study aimed to evaluate the in-vitro toxicity and in-vivo antidiabetic effects of a standardized extract from Eugenia uniflora (E. uniflora) fruit, comparing its efficacy to metformin (Met), a widely used anti-hyperglycemic drug. First, toxicity of the extract was determined by MTT assay in 3T3 cell line and primary astrocyte culture. Then Wistar rats were divided into four groups: I- Control, II- type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), III- T2DM + Met and IV- T2DM + E. uniflora. To induce T2DM, groups II, III and IV received a high fat diet (HFD) for 3 weeks followed by a single intraperitoneal (i.p.) dose of streptozotocin (STZ, 35 mg/kg). Animals of group I received normal diet and vehicle (i.p.). Group III received Met (250 mg/kg) and group IV received E. uniflora (200 mg/kg) intragastric pathway, once a day, throughout all experimental protocol. Animals from the groups I and II received water in the same volume. Results showed that cell viability was not affected. In-vivo, E. uniflora and Met prevented the change in serum levels of glucose, cholesterol, LDL, triglyceride and interleukin-6. Furthermore, extract and Met improved oxidative stress markers and antioxidant enzyme activity in the brain (cerebral cortex, hippocampus, striatum). Furthermore, extract enhanced the downstream insulin signaling pathway, including insulin receptor substrate 1, forkhead box protein O-3a, as well as activated the nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 in the cerebral cortex. This study indicates that E. uniflora extract may have potential in preventing complications associated with T2DM; nevertheless, additional studies are required to confirm these effects and establish their clinical significance.

Indexed as

BrainDiabetes Mellitus, ExperimentalDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2EugeniaFruitHypoglycemic AgentsPlant ExtractsSyzygiumAnimalsCell SurvivalDiet, High-FatMaleMetforminMiceOxidative StressRatsHypoglycemic AgentsMetforminPlant ExtractsBrainEugenia unifloraHyperglycemiaInsulinInterleukin-6

Identifiers

PMID41134426

What Socratic holds

Texttitle and abstract
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.