ReviewJournal of physiology and biochemistry2025
Preclinical research in obesity-associated metabolic diseases using in vitro, multicellular, and non-mammalian models.
Review in Journal of physiology and biochemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Phytocannabinoids as epigenetic regulators: bridging DNA methylation and redox homeostasis in glioblastoma.Journal of applied genetics · 2026Article
- Rewiring Adipocyte Plasticity: The Redox-Mitochondrial Axis as a Driver of Beige Fat Immunometabolism and Adipose Inflammation.Biomolecules · 2026Review
- Assessment of safety profile and anti-obesity effects of innovative plant-based food formulations in a zebrafish diet-induced obesity model.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Addressing the physiological effects of bioactive compounds in metabolic diseases (i.e., obesity, diabetes, liver steatosis) and establishing their mechanisms of action have been a major interest for the last decades. However, methodologies that can be applied to achieve this can vary greatly, leading to a limited type of information. Thus, the accuracy, robustness, reliability and potential (human) translation are highly reliant on the experimental design and selected methodological models. This review presents an update exploring the main features, advantages and disadvantages of most important pre-clinical models used at the present time to study the effects of bioactive compounds on metabolic diseases. Moreover, future challenges in developing new methods are also depicted. In vitro models (enzyme assays and standard two-dimensional cultures of adipocytes, skeletal muscle cells) are intrinsically well established and constitute the first choice and most widely used methods to study bioactive compounds in metabolic diseases. However, novel models such as three-dimensional cultures (spheroids, organoids) are also starting to emerge and complement traditional culture systems. Models of small organisms (C. elegans, D. melanogaster) and non-mammal vertebrates (D. rerio) represent a scientific advantage and a middle-step before traditional mammalian models (rats and mice). This article provides extensive information and a critical overview of a wide range of methods that represent present and future avenues towards a further understanding of metabolic diseases. Combining and developing new methods will be key for future progression on the effects of bioactive compounds on metabolic diseases, as well as to minimize the use of mammalian models due to ethical reasons.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.