SynthesisQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2025
Quality of life in nasopharyngeal carcinoma survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal outcomes.
Synthesis in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Humanistic nursing care and quality of life in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a prospective observational study.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Unmet supportive care needs among head and neck cancer survivors in China: multicenter cross-sectional study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeDespite advances in treatment, many nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) survivors face substantial and enduring quality of life (QOL) impairments. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to explore trends and factors influencing QOL in NPC patients across various treatment modalities over time, to inform patient-centered care strategies.
methodsA systematic search of five databases was performed for studies published between January 2000 and August 2024. Eligible studies included adult NPC patients receiving primary treatment, with longitudinal QOL assessments using the EORTC QLQ-C30 and/or QLQ-H&N35. Meta-analyses of mean differences across four timepoints were conducted: baseline, short-term (0-3 months after treatment), medium-term (4-6 months after treatment), and long-term (7-24 months after treatment). Subgroup analysis compared radiotherapy (RT) alone versus RT with chemotherapy (RT + CT). Only changes that were both statistically significant and exceeded established minimally clinically important difference thresholds were considered clinically meaningful.
resultsA total of 2979 patients from 17 studies were included. Across all treatments, many QOL domains worsened post-treatment, with partial recovery by the medium term. Compared to baseline, global QOL, emotional and social function improved in the long term, while dry mouth and sticky saliva had persistently large deteriorations. RT + CT patients experienced a sharper initial decline but showed greater medium-term recovery in some domains compared to RT-only patients, though this was confounded by disease stage.
conclusionNPC treatment causes significant short-term QOL impairment, with partial recovery. However, persistent long-term issues remain, highlighting the need for long-term supportive care and targeted rehabilitation to improve patient-centered care in NPC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41134501What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.