ArticleHepatology international2026
Comparison of diagnostic criteria for fatty liver disease in assessing cardiac dysfunction: a cross-sectional study.
Article in Hepatology international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimsMetabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is an alternative to the established definition of metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD). We aimed to compare the utility of using MASLD and MAFLD in identifying individuals with impaired cardiac function.
methodsThis cross-sectional study included 7,094 participants who underwent routine health examinations at Asan Medical Centre in Seoul, Republic of Korea. Abdominal ultrasonography was performed to diagnose fatty liver disease. Transthoracic echocardiography was performed to assess cardiac function.
resultsMASLD and MAFLD were identified in 2,436 (34.3%) and 2,578 (36.3%) participants, respectively. Significantly lower E wave and E/A ratio with higher LA diameter, A wave, and E/E' ratio were observed in patients diagnosed with MASLD or MAFLD, indicating impaired diastolic function. The risk of left ventricular (LV) diastolic dysfunction is significantly higher in patients diagnosed with MAFLD only than in those diagnosed with MASLD only (24.2% vs 10.9%). Logistic regression analysis revealed, that compared with the presence of MASLD, the presence of MAFLD was independently associated with a 2.857-fold increase in the risk of LV diastolic dysfunction (95% confidence interval: 1.121-7.281, p = 0.028), even after adjusting for age, sex, and other clinical variables.
conclusionsThe MAFLD and MASLD criteria are associated with LV diastolic dysfunction; however, the MAFLD criteria more accurately reflect early cardiac impairment in a generally healthy population. Therefore, adopting the MAFLD criteria in clinical practice may facilitate improved cardiovascular risk stratification and early intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41134524What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.