ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2025
Development of a digital energy modulation framework in projectional radiography.
Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Development of a digital energy modulation framework in projectional radiography.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeDigital energy modulation is a novel framework with the potential to enhance projectional x-ray imaging by enabling translation between different x-ray energy domains. We evaluate the feasibility of integrating machine learning methods into this approach by leveraging digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRRs) generated from dual-energy CT datasets.
methodsDRRs were created in 15° increments from 0° to 90°, producing 3500 images per energy domain (2 polyenergetic, 4 monoenergetic). A supervised deep-learning approach was used to train models for energy translation, focusing on conversions between polyenergetic domains and from polyenergetic to monoenergetic images. Model performance was assessed using peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR), structural similarity index (SSIM), mean squared error (MSE), and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE). Cross-validation and projection-specific dataset splits were used for evaluation.
resultsThe models trained using cross-validation on the various energy translations achieved the following results: PSNR: 29.1 ± 2.0, SSIM: 0.947 ± 0.017, MSE: 169.1 ± 68.3, MAPE: 8.2% ± 1.8%. When translating between polyenergetic high-energy and low-energy domains in projection-specific datasets (anterior-posterior [0°] and lateral [90°] views), models achieved the following results: PSNR: 27.4 ± 0.5, SSIM: 0.909 ± 0.003, MSE: 195.9 ± 39.7, MAPE: 10.4% ± 2.1%.
conclusionThese findings demonstrate the feasibility of a digital energy modulation framework for projectional x-ray imaging using machine learning for energy translation. The results support the potential of this approach to enhance projectional x-ray imaging, though future work is needed to refine the models and further explore clinical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.