ArticleEuropean journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery2025
The "Heart-and-Brain Interaction" in Newborns with Complex Congenital Heart Disease.
Article in European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neonatal brain structure, cognitively stimulating parenting and behavioural outcomes in preschool children with congenital heart disease and controls.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Perioperative mortality and 1-year neurodevelopmental outcome after cardiac surgery prior to 6 weeks of age, requiring perioperative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in the first year of life.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Research hotspots and trend of the heart-brain axis by MRI: a bibliometric analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesNeonates with complex congenital heart disease (CHD), in particular newborns with hypoplastic left heart syndrome (HLHS) or transposition of the great arteries (TGA), may show brain pathologies and altered brain growth after birth. Our prospective study investigates brain volumes and immature brain structures in these patient groups compared to healthy controls.
methodsNeonatal cerebral magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans were analysed by semi-automated segmentation (dHCP pipeline) in 51 children: 31 HLHS/hypoplastic left heart complex (HLHC)/UVH (61%) at stage I, in 18 neonates with TGA (35%) and in 2 with aortic arch obstruction and biventricular physiology (4%) at a mean GA 41.2 weeks, and in 209 controls at a mean GA 41.6 at time of the MRI. Newborns born premature were excluded. Brain volume comparisons used mixed models for imaging techniques and linear regression for CHD-control differences.
resultsCerebral MRI was abnormal in 29 patients (57%), with multiple lesions in some patients: including liquor space enlargements (20%), small grey (20%) and white matter injuries (12%), stroke (8%), subdural haemorrhage (22%), and sinus venous thrombosis (8%). Sixty-nine percent of CHD neonates showed signs of brain immaturity in relation to GA. Intracranial volumes were reduced, while cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) volumes were enlarged compared to controls.
conclusionsNeonates with complex CHD show reduced cerebral growth, higher risk for brain injuries, and impaired brain maturation, even before first surgery. This might constitute a higher perioperative risk in these patient groups than for normal developed brains. Identification of distinct patterns of brain volume loss might enable risk stratification for subsequent neuro-developmental impairment. CLINICAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: DRKS00036700.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.