ArticlePloS one2025
Utilizing multi-level convolutional neural networks to achieve refined modeling and visual analysis of college students' mental health data.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Early identification of students' mental health issues has become an urgent priority in education and public health. However, existing studies often rely on questionnaire-based assessments or traditional machine learning models, which are limited by manual feature design and weak ability to capture the multidimensional and dynamic characteristics of psychological data. This creates a research gap in developing more adaptive and automated approaches for reliable prediction and monitoring. To address this limitation, the present study proposes the use of Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) for mental health modeling, taking advantage of its capability to automatically extract hierarchical features from multimodal inputs. For comparative purposes, Gradient Boosting Decision Tree (GBDT) and Support Vector Machine (SVM) are also implemented as baseline methods. A dataset combining academic performance, emotional fluctuations, social behavior, and lifestyle indicators was preprocessed and used for experiments.Results demonstrate that CNN achieves the highest predictive accuracy of 94%, compared to 89% for SVM and 87% for GBDT. Beyond accuracy, CNN also shows faster convergence and greater robustness across k-fold cross-validation. These findings highlight the significance of CNN as a more powerful tool for handling high-dimensional psychological data. The study contributes to bridging the gap between traditional mental health assessment and intelligent data-driven approaches, providing practical value for early risk detection and personalized interventions among students.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.