Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41134840›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Video-based pelvic floor muscle therapy for patients with pelvic floor disorders: A Protocol for a prospective single-arm pilot and feasibility study.

Samantha M Linhares, Madeline L D'Aquila, Kurt S Schultz, Anne K Mongiu

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06689891 (Utilizing Remote, Video-Based Pelvic Floor Muscle Therapy), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06689891 narecruitingnot on this map

Utilizing Remote, Video-Based Pelvic Floor Muscle Therapy: A Feasibility Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorYale UniversityRan2025 to 2026Enrolled20ConditionsPelvic Floor Disorder, Pelvic Floor Muscle ExerciseArmsPelvic Floor Muscle Therapy Website
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Samantha M LinharesDivision of Colon & Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America.
Madeline L D'AquilaDivision of Colon & Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7444-3045
Kurt S SchultzDivision of Colon & Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America.
Anne K MongiuDivision of Colon & Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The number of patients who suffer from pelvic floor disorders increases with age and can have a significant impact on quality of life. The first-line treatment for these different disorders includes pelvic floor rehabilitation. However, there are high rates of non-compliance with completing the recommended duration of treatment due to delays in appointments and time constraints. Thus, the primary goal of this study is to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of an online eight-week video-based pelvic floor muscle therapy program. A secondary goal is determining whether the treatment can improve quality of life and symptoms. This study is a registry-based pilot single-arm prospective trial (NCT06689891: Video-Based Pelvic Floor Muscle Therapy). A single-arm design was utilized because our primary aim was to assess feasibility rather than comparative efficacy. Methodical guidance recommends a single-arm approach when outcomes focus on process measures instead of hypothesis testing. This design allows us to evaluate whether the intervention can be delivered as intended, establish feasibility before a larger trial, and maintain flexibility for modification without compromising a control group. Eligible participants will be offered the online program as an alternative to in-person pelvic floor rehabilitation. Primary timepoints include a pre-intervention in-person visit with a licensed pelvic floor therapist and the 8-week video-based pelvic floor muscle therapy program. There will be a midpoint evaluation followed by a post-intervention visit with the same pelvic floor therapist, where participants will be graded on their ability to complete the various exercises to assess efficacy. A survey assessing the online-based program's usability will be conducted post-intervention. Patient-reported outcome measures, including quality of life and symptom changes, will be collected pre-, mid-, and post-intervention. As this is a pilot trial, the goal is to establish the acceptability and feasibility of a video-based pelvic floor muscle therapy program as an alternative to in-person treatment.

Indexed as

Exercise TherapyPelvic FloorPelvic Floor DisordersAdultFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsProspective StudiesQuality of Life

Identifiers

PMID41134840
PMCPMC12551819

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.