Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41134860›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Addressing multicollinearity in general linear model: A novel approach for ridge parameter with performance comparison.

Muhammad Luqman, Sajjad Haider Bhatti, Demet Aydin, Mohsin Jamil

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Muhammad LuqmanCollege of Statistical Sciences, University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan.
Sajjad Haider BhattiCollege of Statistical Sciences, University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3206-4565
Demet AydinData Science and Analytics, Sinop University, Sinop, Türkiye.
Mohsin JamilCollege of Statistical Sciences, University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The problem of ill-conditioned data or multicollinearity is common in regression modelling. The problem results in imprecise parameter estimation which leads to inability of gauging true impact of explanatory variables on the response. Also, due to strong multicollinearity, standard errors of parameter estimates get inflated leading to wider confidence intervals and hence increased risk of type-II error. To handle the problem, different approaches have been proposed in literature. Primarily, such techniques penalize the coefficient estimates in one way or other. Ridge regression is one of the most applied among such techniques. In ridge regression, a penalty term is added in the objective function of the general linear model. That penalty term introduces a small amount of bias in parameter estimates with an objective to decrease the mean square error. In the current article, some new choices for ridge constant are proposed. The performance of proposed ridge choices are compared through Monte Carlo simulations under different scenarios, using mean square error as measure of performance. The simulation results indicate that the proposed ridge estimator performs better than existing ridge constants, in most cases catering for severity of multicollinearity, number of explanatory variables, sample size and error variance structure. The simulation results were further corroborated by comparing performance of proposed ridge penalties using two real-life applications.

Identifiers

PMID41134860
PMCPMC12551918

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.