ArticleJMIR public health and surveillance2025
Machine Learning Applications in Population and Public Health: Guidelines for Development, Testing, and Implementation.
Article in JMIR public health and surveillance, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ethical Considerations on Artificial Intelligence, Health and Health Care. All That Glisters Is Not Gold.European journal of clinical investigation · 2026Review
- Clinical Evaluation of an AI-Assisted Decision Support System for General Anesthesia Management Based on Data From 6 Centers: Comparative Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Integrating epidemiologic modeling and explainable machine learning to predict and identify factors associated with self-reported depression among adults in Tennessee, United States.Discover mental health · 2026Article
- Building Public Health Data Dashboards: Tutorial Playbook.JMIR public health and surveillance · 2026Article
- Embracing complexity and innovation to tackle the social determinants of health.BMJ global health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Unlabelled: Machine learning (ML), a subset of artificial intelligence, uses large datasets to identify patterns between potential predictors and outcomes. ML involves iterative learning from data and is increasingly used in population and public health. Examples include early warning of infectious disease outbreaks, predicting the future burden of noncommunicable diseases, and assessing public health interventions. However, ML can inadvertently produce biased outputs related to the quality and quantity of data, who is engaged and helping direct the analysis, and how findings are interpreted. Specific guidelines for using ML in population and public health have not yet been created. We assembled a diverse team of experts in computer science, statistical modeling, clinical and population health epidemiology, health economics, ethics, sociology, and public health. Drawing on literature reviews and a modified Delphi process, we identified five key recommendations: (1) prioritize partnerships and interventions to support communities considered structurally disadvantaged; (2) use ML for dynamic situations, such as public health emergencies, while adhering to ethical standards; (3) conduct risk assessments and bias mitigation strategies aligned with identified risks; (4) ensure technical transparency and reproducibility by publicly sharing data sources and methodologies; and (5) foster multidisciplinary dialogue to discuss the potential harms of ML-related bias and raise awareness among the public and public health community. The proposed guidelines provide operational steps for stakeholders, ensuring that ML tools are not only effective but also ethically grounded and feasible in real-world scenarios.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.