ArticleCancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII2025
Bispecific antibodies (PD-1/CTLA-4) vs. PD-1 inhibitors with platinum-based chemotherapy±bevacizumab as first-line therapy for persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer: a retrospective matched cohort study.
Article in Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Targeted Therapy and Immunotherapies in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Mechanisms and Clinical Studies.MedComm · 2026Review
- Editorial for the Special Issue "Current Research on Cancer Biology and Therapeutics: Third Edition".International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTo compare the real-world efficacy and safety of bispecific antibodies (BsAbs, PD-1/CTLA-4) versus PD-1 inhibitors (ICIs), each combined with platinum-based chemotherapy ± bevacizumab, as first-line treatment for persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer (p/r/m CC).
methodsIn our single-center retrospective matched cohort study, 121 patients treated between January 2021 and February 2025 were recruited. They were divided into two groups: the bispecific antibody combination group and the PD-1 inhibitor combination group. After propensity score matching (PSM, 1:1, caliper = 0.2), early response to treatment, survival outcomes, and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were assessed. Subgroup analyses, prognostic analyses, and sensitivity analyses were also conducted.
resultsAfter PSM, 86 patients were analyzed (43 per group). The median follow-up duration was 20.8 months (interquartile range [IQR], 12.1-27.1 months). Early response assessment after two treatment cycles showed no significant difference between the BsAb-Combo and PD-1i-Combo groups (ORR 60.5% vs. 51.2%, p = 0.385; DCR 95.3% vs. 97.7%, p = 1.000). The mPFS was 20.2 months (95% CI, 18.6-not reached) in the BsAb-Combo group and 27.2 months (95% CI, 12.6-not reached) in the PD-1i-Combo group (HR = 0.88, 95% CI 0.44-1.75; log-rank p = 0.708). Grade 3-5 decreased white blood cell count was more frequent with PD-1i-Combo (37.2% vs. 9.3%, p = 0.002), whereas all-grade diarrhea was more common with BsAb-Combo (46.5% vs. 25.6%, p = 0.043). Subgroup analyses suggested that persistent/recurrent with distant metastases tended to benefit more from BsAb-Combo. In multivariate Cox models, ECOG Performance Status 2, lung metastasis, and ≥ 1-year maintenance therapy were independent prognostic factors for PFS.
conclusionBsAbs (PD-1/CTLA-4) combined with platinum-based chemotherapy ± bevacizumab demonstrated comparable efficacy and safety to PD-1 inhibitors and showed a favorable hazard-ratio trend. Hypothesis-generating signals observed in select subgroups, such as those with persistent or recurrent disease with distant metastases, warrant confirmation in prospective studies with extended follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.