Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41136711›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026

AI-Based Multi-Organ Segmentation in Gynecologic Laparoscopy: Comparative Evaluation of Deep Learning Architectures for Anatomical Precision and Surgical Applicability.

Taehoon Lee, So Hyeon Lee, Young Jae Kim, Jongwook Whangbo, Kwang Gi Kim

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Taehoon Lee *Department of Rausser College Natural Resources, Major of Environmental Science, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-4927-4243
So Hyeon Lee *Department of Biohealth & Medical Engineering, Gachon University, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-8163-1424
Young Jae KimGachon Biomedical & Convergence Institute, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0443-0051
Jongwook WhangboMedical Devices R&D Center, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Republic of Korea.
Kwang Gi KimDepartment of Biohealth & Medical Engineering, Gachon University, Seongnam, Republic of Korea. kimkg@gachon.ac.kr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9714-6038

Funding

GRRC program of Gyeonggi province GRRC-Gachon2023(B01)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent advances in deep learning have shown considerable promise in automating anatomical segmentation for laparoscopic gynecological surgery. However, segmenting small and morphologically variable structures such as the ovary and fallopian tube remains a significant challenge. In this study, we conducted a comparative evaluation of three convolutional neural network models-U-Net, Segformer, and MANet-on uterus, ovary, and fallopian tube segmentation using 381 laparoscopic images from 21 patients undergoing gynecologic procedures. U-Net demonstrated the most consistent performance, achieving Dice Similarity Coefficients (DSC) of 0.9068 ± 0.0636 for the uterus, 0.2699 ± 0.1273 for ovaries, and 0.2660 ± 0.1187 for fallopian tubes. MANet exhibited the highest precision for uterus segmentation (0.9182 ± 0.0594), while Segformer provided balanced specificity across structures. Despite these strengths, all models exhibited substantial performance degradation when segmenting smaller organs, with a 70.6% reduction in DSC between uterus and fallopian tube segmentation. These results highlight persistent technical challenges in laparoscopic image analysis, particularly for small or ambiguous structures. These findings provide an initial benchmark highlighting both the promise and the limitations of current deep learning approaches for laparoscopic gynecologic image analysis and emphasize the need for further research to improve segmentation of mobile, low-contrast structures under real-world surgical conditions.

Indexed as

Deep LearningGynecologic Surgical ProceduresImage Processing, Computer-AssistedLaparoscopyConvolutional Neural NetworksFallopian TubesFemaleHumansNeural Networks, ComputerOvaryUterusConvolutional neural networksDeep learningFallopian tubeLaparoscopyMedical image analysisOvary segmentationUterus segmentation

Identifiers

PMID41136711
PMCPMC13481655

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.