Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41136768›Full record

GuidelineOrthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany)2025

[Physical training for fracture prevention : Evidence- and consensus-based practice recommendations of the updated DVO guideline].

Wolfgang Kemmler, Daniel Schoene, Matthias Kohl, Friederike Thomasius, Franz Jakob, Katharina Kerschan-Schindl, Uwe Lange, Clemens Becker, Stefan Peters, Simon von Stengel

Abstract readEnglish AbstractPractice GuidelineReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Guideline in Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Wolfgang KemmlerInstitut für Radiologie, Universitäts-Klinikum Erlangen, Henkestraße 91, 91052, Erlangen, Deutschland. wolfgang.kemmler@fau.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3515-0669
Daniel SchoeneInstitut für Radiologie, Universitäts-Klinikum Erlangen, Henkestraße 91, 91052, Erlangen, Deutschland.
Matthias KohlDepartment of Health, Medical and Life Sciences, Fachhochschule Furtwangen, Furtwangen, Deutschland.
Friederike ThomasiusDachverband Osteologie (DVO), Essen, Deutschland.
Franz JakobDachverband Osteologie (DVO), Essen, Deutschland.
Katharina Kerschan-SchindlÖsterreichische Gesellschaft für Knochen- und Mineralstoffwechsel, Wien, Österreich.
Uwe LangeDeutsche Gesellschaft für Physikalische Medizin und Rehabilitation, Dresden, Deutschland.
Clemens BeckerUnit Digitale Geriatrie, Geriatrisches Zentrum, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Deutschland.
Stefan PetersInstitut für Sportwissenschaft, Universität der Bundeswehr, München, Neubiberg, Deutschland.
Simon von StengelInstitut für Radiologie, Universitäts-Klinikum Erlangen, Henkestraße 91, 91052, Erlangen, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExercise is an effective intervention for preventing low-trauma fractures, but optimized training recommendations for different target groups are not available in terms of the desired level of detail or with the desired practical orientation. TRAINING TARGETS: The primary aim of this evidence- and consensus-based guideline was, therefore, to derive personalized practice recommendations for effective, safe, and transferable training programs for fracture prevention. The present approach is based on assigning training goals according to the determinants of fracture risk that are relevant to the individual, such as bone strength, fall risk, and risk of fall-related injury. EXERCISES: Training protocols for maintaining or improving bone strength should generally include phases of intensive mechanical loading, which can be achieved through weight-bearing exercises and dynamic strength training. The fall risk should be addressed through an individualized combination of balance training, including perturbation training, step training, and interactive cognitive-motor and functional strength training. Simple, low-risk strategies for landing safely during or after a fall can be recommended without reservation; however, more demanding falling techniques require close supervision by experienced staff and high safety standards. Ideally, the frequency of training should be three sessions per week across all training goals. We advise (block) periodized approaches with phases of different focus, as well as consistent, individual adaptation and progression throughout the training process.

Indexed as

Exercise TherapyFractures, BoneAccidental FallsConsensusEvidence-Based MedicineHumansResistance TrainingBone strengthFallsMiddle aged and ElderlyPhysical exerciseS3 Guideline

Identifiers

PMID41136768

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.