ArticleBMC geriatrics2025
Dual-task walking for early detection of Alzheimer's disease: comparative analysis of tasks using whole-body gait variables.
Article in BMC geriatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe worldwide rise in dementia creates an urgent need for screening methods that are both sensitive and easy to administer. Dual-task walking-requiring people to walk while performing a second cognitive or motor task-meets these criteria because it stresses gait and cognition simultaneously, revealing deficits that emerge early in Alzheimer's disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI). Although recent studies have explored integrating various gait variables from dual-task assessment with classification models, there remains uncertainty regarding the effective gait variables for inclusion in these models and the selection of the most effective tasks. This study aims to investigate whether incorporating gait variables derived from whole-body movement characteristics improves the performance of classification models and to identify the most effective tasks for inclusion in these models.
methodsWe analyzed data from 36 participants, including 18 cognitively normal individuals and 18 with MCI. Using motion capture technology, gait variables encompassing whole-body movements, including upper body dynamics, were recorded under both normal walking conditions and during dual-task performance. The dual tasks included: (1) Subtracting threes from a given number, (2) Carrying a cup on a tray without moving it, (3) Holding a cup filled with water without spilling it, and (4) Answering verbal questions. Classification models utilized were k-nearest neighbors, random forest, and support vector machines, with performance evaluated by the area under the curve (AUC).
resultsFirst, we observed that variables related to upper-body motion (i.e., Anterior-Posterior and Medial-Lateral sway) while walking played an important role in the classification models for detecting MCI, particularly during cognitively demanding tasks (subtracting numbers and answering verbal questions) while walking. Second, the tasks carrying a cup on a tray and holding a cup filled with water while walking yielded superior classification model performance to other tasks especially in considering multiple features (AUC = 0.79).
conclusionsThis study underscores the benefits of incorporating gait variables of the upper body to enhance the performance of classification models for MCI detection. These insights could contribute to the development of more precise and practical screening tools for MCI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.