Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41137142›Full record

ArticleVeterinary research2025

Tuberculosis vaccination: microbiological and immunological summary of a series of experimental challenge studies.

Ramon A Juste, Iker A Sevilla, Esmeralda Minguijon, Miguel Fuertes, Natalia Elguezabal, Mariví Geijo, Patricia Vazquez, Miriam Serrano, Arrazuria Rakel, Christian Gortazar and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Ramon A JusteNEIKER-Instituto Vasco de Investigación y Desarrollo Agrario. Animal Health Department. Derio, Bizkaia, Spain. rjuste@neiker.eus.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6037-5873
Iker A SevillaNEIKER-Instituto Vasco de Investigación y Desarrollo Agrario. Animal Health Department. Derio, Bizkaia, Spain.
Esmeralda MinguijonNEIKER-Instituto Vasco de Investigación y Desarrollo Agrario. Animal Health Department. Derio, Bizkaia, Spain.
Miguel FuertesNEIKER-Instituto Vasco de Investigación y Desarrollo Agrario. Animal Health Department. Derio, Bizkaia, Spain.
Natalia ElguezabalNEIKER-Instituto Vasco de Investigación y Desarrollo Agrario. Animal Health Department. Derio, Bizkaia, Spain.
Mariví GeijoNEIKER-Instituto Vasco de Investigación y Desarrollo Agrario. Animal Health Department. Derio, Bizkaia, Spain.
Patricia VazquezNEIKER-Instituto Vasco de Investigación y Desarrollo Agrario. Animal Health Department. Derio, Bizkaia, Spain.
Miriam SerranoNEIKER-Instituto Vasco de Investigación y Desarrollo Agrario. Animal Health Department. Derio, Bizkaia, Spain.
Arrazuria RakelNEIKER-Instituto Vasco de Investigación y Desarrollo Agrario. Animal Health Department. Derio, Bizkaia, Spain.
Christian GortazarSaBio (Health and Biotechnology), Instituto de Investigación en Recursos Cinegéticos IREC (CSIC-UCLM), Ciudad Real, Spain.
Amaia EtxezarretaNEIKER-Instituto Vasco de Investigación y Desarrollo Agrario. Animal Health Department. Derio, Bizkaia, Spain.
Elena MolinaNEIKER-Instituto Vasco de Investigación y Desarrollo Agrario. Animal Health Department. Derio, Bizkaia, Spain.
Joseba M GarridoNEIKER-Instituto Vasco de Investigación y Desarrollo Agrario. Animal Health Department. Derio, Bizkaia, Spain.

Funding

Agencia Estatal de Investigación AGL2014-56305-C3-3-R
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The complexity of bovine tuberculosis (TB) epidemiology, especially in extensive livestock systems with wildlife reservoirs, calls for novel control strategies such as vaccination. This study evaluated the comparative efficacy of homologous and heterologous inactivated vaccines against that of the live Bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccine on M. bovis isolation, gross TB lesions, and immune responses. Data from four controlled vaccination and challenge trials involving 41 calves were analysed. Animals were vaccinated with live BCG or heat-inactivated M. bovis via oral or parenteral routes, and immunologic and post-mortem analyses were conducted to evaluate vaccine performance. Compared with nonvaccinated controls, all vaccination strategies significantly reduced M. bovis bacterial loads in the lungs (up to 99%). However, bacterial loads in lymphoid tissues increased, confirming that tuberculosis is primarily a lymphatic disease. Diagnostic interference varied by vaccine type and administration route, with oral administration resulting in lower interference. Gross lesion scores were inconsistent across groups, suggesting limited utility as a measure of vaccine efficacy. Immune responses revealed increased detection of infection, particularly with inactivated vaccines. The lung bacterial load appeared to be decoupled from cellular immune responses, lymph node lesions and bacterial load, which were negatively correlated. Inactivated vaccines can offer a safe and effective means of reducing the bovine TB reproductive rate (R₀) even without total bacterial clearance. These findings highlight the need for revised evaluation criteria and support the integration of inactivated vaccines into TB control strategies.

Indexed as

BCG VaccineMycobacterium bovisTuberculosis, BovineVaccinationAnimalsBacterial LoadCattleVaccines, InactivatedBCG VaccineVaccines, Inactivatedcattleinactivated vaccineinfectioninterferon gammaM. bovisrouteskin testtransmissionTuberculosisvaccine

Identifiers

PMID41137142
PMCPMC12553269

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.