Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41137733›Full record

ArticleGenetic epidemiology2025

Exploring Random Forest in Genetic Risk Score Construction.

Vaishnavi Venkat, Kaylyn Clark, X Jessie Jeng, Tsung-Chieh Yao, Hui-Ju Tsai, Tzu-Pin Lu, Tzu-Hung Hsiao, Ching-Heng Lin, Shannon Holloway, Cathrine Hoyo and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetic epidemiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Vaishnavi VenkatBioinformatics Research Center, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0009-0004-8206-9403
Kaylyn ClarkPerelman School of Medicine, Penn Neurodegeneration Genomics Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
X Jessie JengDepartment of Statistics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.
Tsung-Chieh YaoDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Allergy, Asthma, and Rheumatology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Hui-Ju TsaiInstitute of Population Health Sciences, National Health Research Institutes, Zhunan, Taiwan.
Tzu-Pin LuInstitute of Health Data Analytics and Statistics, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Tzu-Hung HsiaoDepartment of Medical Research, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Ching-Heng LinDepartment of Medical Research, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Shannon HollowayDepartment of Statistics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.
Cathrine HoyoDepartment of Biological Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.
Shin-Yi ChouDepartment of Economics, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, USA.
Hui WangPerelman School of Medicine, Penn Neurodegeneration Genomics Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4043-5060
Wan-Ping LeePerelman School of Medicine, Penn Neurodegeneration Genomics Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Li-San WangPerelman School of Medicine, Penn Neurodegeneration Genomics Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Jung-Ying TzengBioinformatics Research Center, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.

Funding

THE NIA GENETICS OF ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE DATA STORAGE SITEU24AG041689 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI LI-SAN WANG · 2012 to 2026
$42.3M
Copy Number Variation Identification and Association Study on Alzheimer's Disease Whole Genome Sequencing DataRF1AG074328 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI LEE, WAN-PING, TZENG, JUNG-YING · 2021 to 2021
$2.3M
NIA NIH HHS RF1 AG074328NIA NIH HHS U24 AG041689
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetic risk scores (GRS) are crucial tools for estimating an individual's genetic liability to various traits and diseases, computed as a weighted sum of trait-associated allele counts. Traditionally, GRS models assume additive, linear effects of risk variants. However, complex traits often involve nonadditive interactions, such as epistasis, which are not captured by these conventional methods. In this study, we investigate the use of random forest (RF) models as a model-free approach for constructing GRS, leveraging RF's capacity to capture complex, nonlinear interactions among genetic variants. Specifically, we introduce two new RF-based GRS strategies to boost RF performance and to incorporate base data information if available, including (1) ctRF, which optimizes linkage disequilibrium (LD) clumping and p-value thresholds within RF; and (2) wRF, which adjusts the chance of SNP inclusion in tree nodes based on their association strength. Through simulation studies and real data applications of Alzheimer's disease, body mass index, and atopy, we find that ctRF consistently outperforms other RF-based methods and classical additive models when traits exhibit complex genetic architectures. Additionally, incorporating informative base data into RF-GRS construction can enhance predictive accuracy. Our findings suggest that RF-based GRS can effectively capture intricate genetic interactions, and offer a robust alternative to traditional GRS methods, especially for complex traits with nonlinear genetic effects.

Indexed as

Genetic Predisposition to DiseaseModels, GeneticAlzheimer DiseaseBody Mass IndexComputer SimulationEpistasis, GeneticGenetic Risk ScoreGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansLinkage DisequilibriumPolymorphism, Single NucleotideRandom ForestRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID41137733
PMCPMC12553327

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.