Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41137982›Full record

ArticleInsights into imaging2025

Pathology of the conus medullaris and cauda equina. Beyond the usual suspects.

Nerses Nersesyan, Maria Lucia Brun Vergara, Azza Reda, Suely Fazio Ferraciolli, Leandro Lucato, Carlos Torres

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Insights into imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Neuroschistosomiasis Mimicking Spinal Tuberculosis: A Case Report.Nigerian medical journal : journal of the Nigeria Medical Association
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nerses NersesyanThe Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada. nerses.sci@proton.me.
Maria Lucia Brun VergaraThe Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada. marialuciabrun@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5983-6003
Azza RedaKing Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Suely Fazio FerraciolliPediatric Imaging Research Center, Harvard Medical School & Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Leandro LucatoHospital das Clínicas, Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Carlos TorresThe Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPathologies affecting the conus medullaris and cauda equina can present with overlapping clinical symptoms, making an accurate diagnosis essential. Conus medullaris syndrome results from damage at the T12-L2 level, while cauda equina syndrome arises from nerve root compression below the conus. Both conditions may cause motor deficits, sensory disturbances, and autonomic dysfunction, necessitating a detailed differential diagnosis.

objectiveThis educational review highlights common and rare etiologies of conus medullaris and cauda equina lesions, emphasizing imaging characteristics and diagnostic considerations. A comprehensive review of tumors, infections, inflammatory, vascular, and degenerative conditions affecting these regions was performed. Contrast-enhanced MRI was identified as the gold standard for diagnosis. REVISED PATHOLOGIES: Tumors: myxopapillary ependymomas and schwannomas are the most frequent neoplasms, while drop metastases and glioblastomas represent rarer entities. INFECTIONS: tuberculous arachnoiditis, bacterial radiculitis, schistosomiasis, and neurocysticercosis may mimic neoplastic processes. Inflammatory disorders: Guillain-Barré syndrome, neurosarcoidosis, and MOGAD may cause nerve root thickening and enhancement. Vascular lesions: spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas, infarcts, and arteriovenous malformations can produce conus and cauda equina symptoms. Miscellaneous causes: developmental anomalies like diastematomyelia and ventriculus terminalis, along with degenerative diseases, can mimic other conditions.

conclusionRadiologists play a pivotal role in differentiating conus medullaris and cauda equina pathologies. A thorough understanding of imaging findings is essential for accurate diagnosis and effective management. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Conus medullaris and cauda lesions present with overlapping clinical symptoms but show some distinct imaging patterns. It is essential to recognize characteristic features that differentiate neoplastic from infectious or vascular etiologies. KEY POINTS: Conus and cauda lesions have varied causes; MRI with contrast is vital for accurate diagnosis. Myxopapillary ependymomas cause vertebral scalloping; schwannomas may be cystic; intramedullary gliomas expand the cord. Conus medullaris and cauda lesions overlap clinically; imaging helps distinguish neoplastic from infectious or vascular causes.

Indexed as

Cauda equinaConus medullarisMOGADPrimary conus medullaris gliomaSpinal schistosomiasis

Identifiers

PMID41137982
PMCPMC12553641

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.