ArticleInfectious diseases and therapy2025
Efficacy of Lactococcus lactis Strain Plasma in Patients with Mild COVID-19: A Multicenter, Double-Blinded, Randomized-Controlled Trial (PLATEAU Study).
Article in Infectious diseases and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Probiotics and Bacteriocins Against SARS-CoV-2: Therapeutic Frontiers and Mechanistic Insights.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2026Review
- Effects ofTropical medicine and infectious disease · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
29 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), is still an ongoing public health threat. COVID-19 can be accompanied by prolonged symptoms, known as "long COVID", however, no pharmaceutical treatments are currently available for these symptoms. Lactococcus lactis strain Plasma (LC-Plasma; Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis JCM 5805) directly activates human plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs) and triggers antiviral immune responses. We hypothesized that LC-Plasma reduced SARS-CoV-2 viral load and eased symptoms in patients with mild COVID-19.
methodsThis PLATEAU study enrolled 100 patients with mild COVID-19 during Omicron BA.1 endemic, who were randomized into the LC-Plasma or placebo group in a 1:1 ratio and were observed for 14 days. The primary endpoint was change in total score of eight subjective symptoms (fatigue, anorexia, headache, cough, shortness of breath, chest pain, smell, and taste disturbance). Secondary endpoints included each symptom, SARS-CoV-2 viral load, and pDCs.
resultsThe primary endpoint did not show between-group differences. However, the proportion of patients without smell and taste disturbances was significantly higher in the LC-Plasma group on day 13 (p = 0.030). The LC-Plasma group showed a significantly earlier decrease in SARS-CoV-2 viral load on day 4 (p < 0.001) and an increase in pDCs on day 8 (p = 0.0498). Mild adverse events, such as diarrhea, cough-variant asthma, and urticaria, occurred in three (5.9%) patients in the LC-Plasma group.
conclusionsThe intake of LC-Plasma in patients with mild COVID-19 activates pDC, decreases SARS-CoV-2 viral load earlier, and may improve smell and taste disorders more quickly. LC-Plasma could be a safe, inexpensive, and easily accessible tool for the treatment of mild COVID-19.
trial registrationjRCTs071210097.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.