Trial reportJournal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale
The Use of Narrow-Band Imaging to Improve Pathological Margin in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.
Trial report in Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Narrow-Band Imaging for the Detection of Oral Potentially Malignant Disorders and Early-Stage Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
ImportanceIntraoperative narrow-band imaging (NBI) has been used to improve superficial (mucosal) resection margin clearance in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). However, no study has been conducted in a randomized controlled trial comparing OSCC resection using NBI and standard white light (WL).ObjectiveTo compare the rate of pathological margin clearance between NBI-guided and WL-guided resection in OSCC patients.DesignParallel-design, single-center, randomized controlled trial.SettingTertiary care center, Department of Otolaryngology.ParticipantsOne hundred and four OSCC patients undergoing surgical resection were included in the study.InterventionPatients were randomly assigned to have either NBI-guided (n = 52) or WL-guided (n = 52) resection.Main Outcome MeasuresFinal pathological margin status and clinical outcomes, including type of defect reconstruction and functional outcomes (persisting tracheostomy and tube feeding), were compared between the 2 groups.ResultsA significantly higher rate of clear superficial margin was achieved in patients in the NBI group than in the WL group (96.2% and 80.8%, respectively,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.