SynthesisEndocrinology, diabetes & metabolism2025
Vitamin D for Painful Diabetic Neuropathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials.
Synthesis in Endocrinology, diabetes & metabolism, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Vitamin B Supplementation for Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy: A Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- The Role of Vitamin D in Neuropathic Pain: Biological Mechanisms and Clinical Relevance.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Targeting N-methyl-D-aspartate 2B receptor in painful diabetic neuropathy - mechanisms, challenges, and emerging therapeutics.World journal of diabetes · 2026Review
- Association of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels with indicators of target organ damage in patients with diabetes: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Vitamin D and cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy in type 2 diabetes mellitus according to diabetic kidney disease stage.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPainful diabetic neuropathy (PDN) is a common complication of type 1 and type 2 diabetes, causing substantial morbidity. Current treatments, including antidepressants and analgesics, are often only partially effective and may have significant side effects. Vitamin D deficiency affects around 60% of people with diabetes, making supplementation a low-toxicity, biologically plausible intervention. Observational studies suggest potential benefit, but robust evidence from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) is lacking.
objectiveTo systematically review and synthesise RCT evidence on the effect of vitamin D supplementation on pain outcomes in PDN.
methodsA systematic search was conducted in Medline, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, EBSCO and Google Scholar up to September 2025. Eligible studies were RCTs comparing vitamin D supplementation with placebo in adults with diabetes and PDN. The primary outcome was pain intensity measured with validated tools. A fixed-effects meta-analysis was performed, with results expressed as standardised mean differences (SMD). Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane RoB tool, and publication bias examined via Egger's funnel plot.
resultsFive studies met inclusion criteria; four (n = 320) were included in the meta-analysis. Pooled results showed a significant short-term reduction in pain with vitamin D versus placebo (SMD = -0.85; 95% CI: -1.07 to -0.62), with moderate heterogeneity (I
conclusionVitamin D supplementation may reduce short-term pain in PDN, but evidence is limited by small sample sizes and methodological quality. Larger, rigorously designed RCTs with longer follow-up are needed before routine vitamin D testing or supplementation can be recommended for PDN in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.