Evidence mapPaperPMID 41139799Full record

SynthesisEndocrinology, diabetes & metabolism2025

Vitamin D for Painful Diabetic Neuropathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials.

Abraham Gilbody, Joseph Gilbody

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Endocrinology, diabetes & metabolism, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Abraham GilbodyNorth Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-0245-6938
Joseph GilbodyMRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4603-8253

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPainful diabetic neuropathy (PDN) is a common complication of type 1 and type 2 diabetes, causing substantial morbidity. Current treatments, including antidepressants and analgesics, are often only partially effective and may have significant side effects. Vitamin D deficiency affects around 60% of people with diabetes, making supplementation a low-toxicity, biologically plausible intervention. Observational studies suggest potential benefit, but robust evidence from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) is lacking.

objectiveTo systematically review and synthesise RCT evidence on the effect of vitamin D supplementation on pain outcomes in PDN.

methodsA systematic search was conducted in Medline, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, EBSCO and Google Scholar up to September 2025. Eligible studies were RCTs comparing vitamin D supplementation with placebo in adults with diabetes and PDN. The primary outcome was pain intensity measured with validated tools. A fixed-effects meta-analysis was performed, with results expressed as standardised mean differences (SMD). Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane RoB tool, and publication bias examined via Egger's funnel plot.

resultsFive studies met inclusion criteria; four (n = 320) were included in the meta-analysis. Pooled results showed a significant short-term reduction in pain with vitamin D versus placebo (SMD = -0.85; 95% CI: -1.07 to -0.62), with moderate heterogeneity (I

conclusionVitamin D supplementation may reduce short-term pain in PDN, but evidence is limited by small sample sizes and methodological quality. Larger, rigorously designed RCTs with longer follow-up are needed before routine vitamin D testing or supplementation can be recommended for PDN in clinical practice.

Indexed as

Diabetic NeuropathiesVitamin DVitamin D DeficiencyVitaminsDietary SupplementsHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicVitamin DVitamins

Identifiers

PMID41139799
PMCPMC12554626

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.