Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41140266›Full record

ReviewJournal of educational evaluation for health professions2025

Prompt engineering for single-best-answer multiple-choice questions in licensing examinations: a narrative review with a case study involving the Korean Medical Licensing Examination.

Bokyoung Kim, Junseok Kang, Min-Young Kim, Jihyun Ahn

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of educational evaluation for health professions, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Bokyoung KimCollege of Nursing, Research Institute of Nursing Innovation, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea.
Junseok KangHarvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Min-Young KimDepartment of Dental Hygiene, Howon University, Gunsan, Korea.
Jihyun AhnDepartment of Internal Medicine, Korea Medical Institute, Seoul, Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The emergence of large language models (LLMs) has generated growing interest in their potential applications for medical assessment and item development. This practice-oriented narrative review examines the potential of LLMs, particularly ChatGPT, for generating and validating single-best-answer multiple-choice questions in health professions licensing examinations, using a Korean Medical Licensing Examination (KMLE)-focused case perspective. We frame LLMs as human-in-the-loop tools rather than replacements for high-stakes testing. Recent applications of LLMs in assessment were reviewed, including prompting strategies such as few-shot, multi-stage, and chain-of-thought methods, as well as retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) to align outputs with exam blueprints. Approaches to enforcing formatting rules, checklist-based self-validation, and iterative refinement were analyzed for their role in supporting item development. Findings indicate that LLMs can perform near passing thresholds on high-stakes exams and assist with grading and feedback tasks. Prompt engineering enhances structural fidelity and clinical plausibility, while human oversight remains critical for accuracy, cultural appropriateness, and psychometric defensibility. The emerging multimodal generation of images, audio, and video suggests the feasibility of new item formats, provided robust validation safeguards are implemented. The most effective approach is a human-in-the-loop workflow that leverages artificial intelligence efficiency while embedding expert judgment, psychometric evaluation, and ethical governance. This practice-oriented roadmap-integrating strategic prompt selection, RAG-based blueprint alignment, rigorous validation gates, and KMLE-specific formatting-offers an implementable and methodologically defensible approach for licensing examinations.

Indexed as

Educational MeasurementLicensure, MedicalHumansLanguagePsychometricsRepublic of KoreaArtificial intelligenceMedical licensureMultiple-choice questions

Identifiers

PMID41140266
PMCPMC12754514

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.